Rejections without clear reasons

[A.Cisneros]

Hello, they rejected a photo from spotting location, they told me that photos inside the airport do not qualify, before uploading it I looked for some rule or article that prohibits it and I found nothing, so I searched for similar photos in the JP database and I found Many, for that reason I uploaded it, should publish the new rules where they clarify clearly what can and cannot be uploaded, so we do not lose slots due to ignorance or lack of information, which is not prohibited, it is legal, my photo and one examples of others accepted

[A.Cisneros]

Another example

[MarkosVicioso]

Hi alonso, A screener comment in your rejection seems to answer your question. Regards

[A.Cisneros]

Hello markos, yes I saw the screener's response, my point is that there is no written rule that prohibits it, I searched the forum for something that prohibits it and I didn't find anything, so I went to look for similar photos in the JP database In order not to make a mistake and upload something that they are going to reject, I found many similar or identical photos, that's why I uploaded mine, if there is no information that prohibits it, and there are identical photos, what would you do? obviously I'll upload it… saludos 👍

[MarkosVicioso]

Hello markos, yes I saw the screener's response, my point is that there is no written rule that prohibits it, I searched the forum for something that prohibits it and I didn't find anything, so I went to look for similar photos in the JP database In order not to make a mistake and upload something that they are going to reject, I found many similar or identical photos, that's why I uploaded mine, if there is no information that prohibits it, and there are identical photos, what would you do? obviously I'll upload it… saludos 👍

I know that feel, i uploaded a hot photo of a plane with stickers change and it was rejected after another user got two accepted of the same change, so it makes me think that because of probabilities and options which are almost infinite, the website crew uses accepted pictures to improve their standard and determine how to upgrade their regulations.
So maybe after accept the pictures you saw they realized those are not spotting sites and then updated interenally that regulation about spotting location pictures...Agree with you that they should share those insights with users to avoid this kinda unnecessary rejections but its ok for me if they dont and use that time to screen the long queue instead!

Saludos y buen trabajo con esas fotos, muy bonitas!!

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Seems pretty clear to me... From the upload guideline :

3.4.2 Spotting location


For spotting locations, the following minimum requirements apply:

• photo must show a public location regularly used for spotting

....



Regards
Alex