Appeals abuse

[Alex - Spot-This !]

If we can't find it quickly either, then yes it's ok - Just leave a short message to screeners that you couldn't find the cn

Regards
Alex

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Hi Marianna,

All badges added - Please note this is really not a A-20G https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10206803 - Will correct it tomorrow

Cheers
Alex

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Patience is mother of all virtues.......

[Alex - Spot-This !]

The Apache looks fantastic !!!!

[Alex - Spot-This !]

All 5 are underexposed, 2-3-4-5 being the worst

Regards
Alex

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Sorry but I don't think you're in a position to decide when it's finished or not. My previous post proves you perfectly knew what you were doing when you opened your second account......

[Alex - Spot-This !]

This is what appeared when you opened your second account so..... You really have no excuses......

[Alex - Spot-This !]

You got an email about it....

and....

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ouble-accounts

[Alex - Spot-This !]

You are VERY talented !! Love your work !!!!

[Alex - Spot-This !]

No clear dust visible, I believe this one should be totally ok.

Regards
Alex...

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Looks too soft

Regards
Alex

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Hi,
Some people seem to believe that almost every single rejection should be appealed. When we see a clear abuse we send a warning.
Unfortunately some people decide to ignore that warning and keep making unnecessary appeals one after the other, leaving us no other choice than to issue slot limitation for a few month period.

Please keep in mind that appeals are extremely time consuming and we have lately seen a huge increase of totally unnecessary appeals. So keep that function for the rare occasions where you sincerely believe the screeners were wrong. Also keep in mind that only about 5-10% of appeals are accepted so...
Also remember that less appeals means more time for us to screen...

Thank you

Alex...

[Alex - Spot-This !]

As you can see form the histogram, the contrast is WAY too strong with both dark tones underexposed and light tones overexposed.

Regards
Alex...

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Hi,
2nd and 5th ones are the best in terms of composition and the only ones who have a chance to get accepted but no guarantees, only talking about the composition

regards
Alex

[Alex - Spot-This !]

added...

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Hi,
There's some good ideas going on here but....
- too much empty space - planes need to be more centered
- nothing seems on focus, making it most of the frame soft or even blurry

For the futur, such shots needs the "other location - xxx" and you need to select the leading plane or the closest from you

So yes, such photos can be accepted but they are much harder to take as a lot of planning is needed, and many factors can ruin it.

Regards
Alex

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Looks ok to me

Regards
Alex

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Ike, point is that those squares are very visible on the non-equalized version, on both my screens. Those squares are compression, either from editing or during saving process. They were also seen by the 2 screeners + the senior who screened your photo and by Ben here. So if you can't see them maybe you should consider a screen calibration ?

As a reminder we do NOT screen the equalize version, we only use it to confirm a 1st impression, most of the time on haloes and dust. I wouldn't have used it on such a clear case as compression here.

Hope it helps
Alex