Invalid Hot reject

[ksaviation1]

Hello!

I was uploaded M994-04 as hot, and then I got “Invalid Hot” rejected.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11688288

then I appeal it and also got reject again.

Your appeal for photo id 11688288 has been processed and has been rejected.
Admin Comments >> https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10358836

Ok, this photo is hot since it reveals the aircraft in its standard painting once again and what’s more important, then the updated part of the aircraft is not visible in the previous uploads aka photo 10348836.

[SpotterCuba]

Hey!

To be honest: I can't see any update to the previous photo... Where is the difference?

An advice from me: Always write into the box "Comments to screeners", what exactly has been changed to clarify a hot photo.

[ksaviation1]

Hey!

To be honest: I can't see any update to the previous photo... Where is the difference?

An advice from me: Always write into the box "Comments to screeners", what exactly has been changed to clarify a hot photo.

If you can’t see what updated plaese look this

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/7656923

[MARK0]

Hello!

I was uploaded M994-04 as hot, and then I got “Invalid Hot” rejected.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11688288

then I appeal it and also got reject again.

Your appeal for photo id 11688288 has been processed and has been rejected.
Admin Comments >> https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10358836

Ok, this photo is hot since it reveals the aircraft in its standard painting once again and what’s more important, then the updated part of the aircraft is not visible in the previous uploads aka photo 10348836.

Honestly i consider the "update" (removal of a bird drawing) very minimal and insignificant for a hot photo, so the invalid hot rejection is correct in my opinion

[SpotterCuba]

Tough one:
Because of the photo angle (10358836) it's not easy to see, if the sticker has been already removed or not.
However I found several pics in the internet that shows, that the sticker has been removed before the pic (10358836) was taken. So the sticker isn't on the helicopter.
My opinion: The reject is still correct.

Even if it would be visible in the upper mentioned pic: You can't upload a pic after years just from the other side as a hot photo. The removal includes both sides.

Next time use my upper mentioned advice.

Honestly i consider the "update" (removal of a bird drawing) very minimal and insignificant for a hot photo, so the invalid hot rejection is correct in my opinion

Upload guidelines says it do count as a hot photo:

Phrase 2.5, second section, number three

[Alex - Spot-This !]

The change is minimal and doesn’t justify jumping the queue.

please remember that hot photos are the main reason for a slow queue and that abusing the system hurts the whole JP community

regards
Alex

[ksaviation1]

The change is minimal and doesn’t justify jumping the queue.

please remember that hot photos are the main reason for a slow queue and that abusing the system hurts the whole JP community

regards
Alex

I am fully aware that abusing the Hotphoto function will cause the queue to slow down, but the bird printing stickers was clearly visible on the helicopter fuselage, is this a small change?

There is a saying in the law: The benefit of the doubt belongs to the defendant, the updated part of the aircraft is not visible in the previous uploads aka photo 10348836.

As someone mentioned above, upload guidelines says it do count as a hot photo:
Phrase 2.5, second section, number three

Any change to the colour scheme (for example: removal of a special scheme, new stickers) or to the aircraft itself (Winglets, Sharklets) - Note that this is only valid for active aircraft

[EDDFspotter]

Your photo was already rejected after your hot photo upload and after your appeal by three different screeners. Three different people in the forum now also told you that the invalid hot rejection is correct. What do you still expect?