Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oslplanespotting - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Thanks, do you think these two looks ok?
    1. horizon, soft, dark/contrast
    2. horizon, dark/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Might run into some problems with processing (editing halos), but otherwise would be ok for me.
    Thanks, do you think these two looks ok?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_1img_4202_edited.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	429.2 KB
ID:	1129509Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_4184_edited.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	614.7 KB
ID:	1129510

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Thanks,

    does these look good now?
    Might run into some problems with processing (editing halos), but otherwise would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    There are issues with dust spots, overprocessing, and (slight) underexposure.
    Thanks,

    does these look good now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_imgp0957_edited_edited.jpg
Views:	109
Size:	495.7 KB
ID:	1129168
    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_imgp0890_edited_edited.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	525.4 KB
ID:	1129167
    Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_1img_3525_edited_edited (1).jpg Views:	0 Size:	493.3 KB ID:	1129160

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Thanks, are these photos acceptable?
    There are issues with dust spots, overprocessing, and (slight) underexposure.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yes, that should qualify as hot.
    Thanks, are these photos acceptable?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_imgp0957_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	462.7 KB ID:	1129040
    Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_1imgp0890_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	503.8 KB ID:	1129039
    Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_2img_3525_edited (1).jpg Views:	0 Size:	477.6 KB ID:	1129038

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post


    Sorry I forgot the link,
    It's because the change of this livery
    LN-ESS | Bcker 131 Jungmann | Private | asgeir westgaard | JetPhotos and how it looks now
    Yes, that should qualify as hot.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. ok for me
    2-3. borderline soft (right side)



    Without further information why it would be, I could not say.

    Sorry I forgot the link,
    It's because the change of this livery
    LN-ESS | Bcker 131 Jungmann | Private | asgeir westgaard | JetPhotos and how it looks now

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post
    Thanks! Its these photos ok?
    1. ok for me
    2-3. borderline soft (right side)

    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post
    Also, is the LN-ESS photo considered hot?
    Without further information why it would be, I could not say.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. contrast, color. probably not fixable.
    2. overprocessed, dirty
    3. horizon, dirty

    Thanks! Its these photos ok? Also, is the LN-ESS photo considered hot?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_11dscf0138.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	1.00 MB
ID:	1128460

    Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_img_0211_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	924.8 KB ID:	1128455Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_img_0257_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	877.3 KB ID:	1128452
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post
    Thanks, I also wonder if these pictures are acceptable. Also is the picture on the top nightshot?
    1. contrast, color. probably not fixable.
    2. overprocessed, dirty
    3. horizon, dirty

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_2752_edited (1).jpg
Views:	80
Size:	760.3 KB
ID:	1127589
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    As mentioned above, not really fixable due to the poor lighting conditions.
    Thanks, I also wonder if these pictures are acceptable. Also is the picture on the top nightshot? Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_imgp0166_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	453.9 KB ID:	1127588
    Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_imgp9814_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	629.0 KB ID:	1127587

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Is this better? Or do it need more or less contrasts
    As mentioned above, not really fixable due to the poor lighting conditions.

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertMahar15
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Is this better? Or do it need more or less contrastsClick image for larger version Name:	rsz_img_2369_edited_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	855.4 KB ID:	1127506
    I don’t think the contrast would be fixable on this photo, due to the fact that the sun is being covered by clouds.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Almost certainly would be a contrast rejection.
    Is this better? Or do it need more or less contrastsClick image for larger version  Name:	rsz_img_2369_edited_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	855.4 KB ID:	1127506

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X