Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

screening help for ronen_fefer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post

    Correct .i do understand that however what should someone for example who lives in a place with cloudy conditions all year what are the options then to get photos accepted on JP?
    Accept that maybe getting photos accepted on JP should not be your primary goal

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Short suggestion: if you take images in cloudy conditions, don't expect much (if any) success when uploading. The flat light light from such conditions is not easily fixable with editing.
    Correct .i do understand that however what should someone for example who lives in a place with cloudy conditions all year what are the options then to get photos accepted on JP?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Hi, i am having trouble understanding contrast in cloudy photographs. what should i look for in the luminosity histogram and is this photo alright?
    Any suggestions to improve my photo editing skills are welcome.
    Short suggestion: if you take images in cloudy conditions, don't expect much (if any) success when uploading. The flat light light from such conditions is not easily fixable with editing.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Hi, i am having trouble understanding contrast in cloudy photographs. what should i look for in the luminosity histogram and is this photo alright?
    Any suggestions to improve my photo editing skills are welcome.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC0752-DeNoiseAI-raw.jpg Views:	0 Size:	308.7 KB ID:	1203730

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Hi, could someone prescreen the following photo?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Shoot you are right.
    by the way I had this photo rejected for being underexposed while if you look at the histogram it isn’t more like over exposed. Is it borderline?
    I'll ask you again to re-read here carefully please:



    Not only have you appealed, but you've reuploaded the image to the queue. As such, I will not be commenting.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Why don't you just provide a direct link to the rejection? Easier, no?
    Shoot you are right.


    by the way I had this photo rejected for being underexposed while if you look at the histogram it isn’t more like over exposed. Is it borderline?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Sorry for not adding it here it is:
    Note compression might impact the image.
    Why don't you just provide a direct link to the rejection? Easier, no?

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Sorry for not adding it here it is:

    Note compression might impact the image.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Hey everyone, I’ve got a rejection on an Austrian a320 OE-LBK for under sharpening (cmos as well but it’s my mistake for missing it) so my question is how do I know if it’s under sharpened, I looked at the reg and the name of the aircraft but it seems to be fine at 1280px. Any help?
    It would help to see the image in question.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Hey everyone, I’ve got a rejection on an Austrian a320 OE-LBK for under sharpening (cmos as well but it’s my mistake for missing it) so my question is how do I know if it’s under sharpened, I looked at the reg and the name of the aircraft but it seems to be fine at 1280px. Any help?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Hello again, could someone help me out here? The following photo was rejected due to wrong categories. Now i have used the auto-fill feature and it seems to be correct. what am i missing?
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!

    if impossible to open, the aircraft registration is OE-LNK a boeing 757-200PCF of DHL Austria.
    This is a Cargo aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • AMGEnthusiast63
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Hello again, could someone help me out here? The following photo was rejected due to wrong categories. Now i have used the auto-fill feature and it seems to be correct. what am i missing?
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!

    if impossible to open, the aircraft registration is OE-LNK a boeing 757-200PCF of DHL Austria.
    The category "Cargo" should be manually chosen for this aircraft. Auto-fill doesn't automatically click categories.

    EDIT: Wrong categories alone don't directly cause a rejection, you must have been given other reasons for rejection. The category issue acts as a reminder, and if there are no issues other than missing categories, the photo will be accepted.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Hello again, could someone help me out here? The following photo was rejected due to wrong categories. Now i have used the auto-fill feature and it seems to be correct. what am i missing?
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!

    if impossible to open, the aircraft registration is OE-LNK a boeing 757-200PCF of DHL Austria.

    Leave a comment:


  • AMGEnthusiast63
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Hello, i need help with figuring out if the contrast and warmth in the photo are acceptable. Now, the photo was taken a few minutes after sunset, so there is no direct sunlight on the photo. So will it count as a night photo and be accepted?

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1naY...usp=drive_link
    Not a screener, but I’m quite sure the lack of sunlight renders the contrast unfixable in this case.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X