Originally posted by ronen_fefer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
screening help for ronen_fefer
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Short suggestion: if you take images in cloudy conditions, don't expect much (if any) success when uploading. The flat light light from such conditions is not easily fixable with editing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ronen_fefer View PostHi, i am having trouble understanding contrast in cloudy photographs. what should i look for in the luminosity histogram and is this photo alright?
Any suggestions to improve my photo editing skills are welcome.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi, i am having trouble understanding contrast in cloudy photographs. what should i look for in the luminosity histogram and is this photo alright?
Any suggestions to improve my photo editing skills are welcome.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi, could someone prescreen the following photo?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ronen_fefer View PostShoot you are right.
by the way I had this photo rejected for being underexposed while if you look at the histogram it isn’t more like over exposed. Is it borderline?
Not only have you appealed, but you've reuploaded the image to the queue. As such, I will not be commenting.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Why don't you just provide a direct link to the rejection? Easier, no?
by the way I had this photo rejected for being underexposed while if you look at the histogram it isn’t more like over exposed. Is it borderline?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ronen_fefer View PostHey everyone, I’ve got a rejection on an Austrian a320 OE-LBK for under sharpening (cmos as well but it’s my mistake for missing it) so my question is how do I know if it’s under sharpened, I looked at the reg and the name of the aircraft but it seems to be fine at 1280px. Any help?
Leave a comment:
-
Hey everyone, I’ve got a rejection on an Austrian a320 OE-LBK for under sharpening (cmos as well but it’s my mistake for missing it) so my question is how do I know if it’s under sharpened, I looked at the reg and the name of the aircraft but it seems to be fine at 1280px. Any help?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ronen_fefer View PostHello again, could someone help me out here? The following photo was rejected due to wrong categories. Now i have used the auto-fill feature and it seems to be correct. what am i missing?
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!
if impossible to open, the aircraft registration is OE-LNK a boeing 757-200PCF of DHL Austria.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ronen_fefer View PostHello again, could someone help me out here? The following photo was rejected due to wrong categories. Now i have used the auto-fill feature and it seems to be correct. what am i missing?
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!
if impossible to open, the aircraft registration is OE-LNK a boeing 757-200PCF of DHL Austria.
EDIT: Wrong categories alone don't directly cause a rejection, you must have been given other reasons for rejection. The category issue acts as a reminder, and if there are no issues other than missing categories, the photo will be accepted.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello again, could someone help me out here? The following photo was rejected due to wrong categories. Now i have used the auto-fill feature and it seems to be correct. what am i missing?
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!
if impossible to open, the aircraft registration is OE-LNK a boeing 757-200PCF of DHL Austria.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ronen_fefer View PostHello, i need help with figuring out if the contrast and warmth in the photo are acceptable. Now, the photo was taken a few minutes after sunset, so there is no direct sunlight on the photo. So will it count as a night photo and be accepted?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1naY...usp=drive_link
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: