Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ajspring - Prescreening

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by ajspring View Post
    Prescreen please.
    After a long hiatus I got a good shooting session in earlier this week and with the new observation area opening at KCLT I will look forward to being active on JP once again in 2024.
    Thanks in advance!
    Hi, Not a screener but 1,2 and 4 look a bit to soft for 1600pix.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by ajspring View Post
      Prescreen please.
      After a long hiatus I got a good shooting session in earlier this week and with the new observation area opening at KCLT I will look forward to being active on JP once again in 2024.
      Thanks in advance!
      Centering, noisy, overprocessed, soft.

      Comment


      • #48
        Woof. Appreciate the feedback and the reminder of how hard it is to get photos on JP. Once I got the hang of it I was getting photos without much effort but am now being reminded of how much work I had to put in to get to that point. Appreciate your patience as I knock the rust off.

        Starting fresh with three new prescreens (albeit from the same session). Thanks again!
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by ajspring View Post
          Woof. Appreciate the feedback and the reminder of how hard it is to get photos on JP. Once I got the hang of it I was getting photos without much effort but am now being reminded of how much work I had to put in to get to that point. Appreciate your patience as I knock the rust off.

          Starting fresh with three new prescreens (albeit from the same session). Thanks again!
          1. centering
          2. centering, dark
          3. centering, overprocessed

          Comment


          • #50
            Appreciate the feedback. Assumed originals were too high and I think I fixed the issues with the UA pic. If UA is still overprocessed, please advise as to reason. Thanks!
            Attached Files

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by ajspring View Post
              Assumed originals were too high
              Incorrect assumption.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	_24-01-02_152917-3.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	719.3 KB
ID:	1179290Click image for larger version

Name:	_24-01-02_152917-3-2.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	719.3 KB
ID:	1179291

              Originally posted by ajspring View Post
              I think I fixed the issues with the UA pic. If UA is still overprocessed, please advise as to reason.
              That one appears to have been corrected.

              On a side note, they all might be a bit soft for 1600pix as well

              Comment

              Working...
              X