Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Taylor P -- Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post

    Yes, sorry if that isn't allowed, I read through the rules and it seemed like asking this was OK
    What was the original image, and why were you attempting to re-upload it?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

      What was the original image, and why were you attempting to re-upload it?
      The original image was the same thing at a 1280px resolution, the new shot was exactly the same edit but at 1600px wide.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post

        The original image was the same thing at a 1280px resolution, the new shot was exactly the same edit but at 1600px wide.
        No reason to reupload that. If you're that desperate to have a larger version in the database, delete the accepted image and take your chance by re-submitting the higher resolution image to the regular queue. Reuploads of previously accepted images will not be accepted just so you can increase the resolution.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

          No reason to reupload that. If you're that desperate to have a larger version in the database, delete the accepted image and take your chance by re-submitting the higher resolution image to the regular queue. Reuploads of previously accepted images will not be accepted just so you can increase the resolution.
          Ahhh ok, thanks for the clarification!

          Just wondering if the quality is there for the following 1600px shots?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	XX177_1.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	860.5 KB
ID:	1163603Click image for larger version

Name:	G-TTNS8.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1163604Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5390-2.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	631.4 KB
ID:	1163605

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post

            Ahhh ok, thanks for the clarification!

            Just wondering if the quality is there for the following 1600px shots?
            1. no
            2. maybe
            3. probably not

            Comment


            • Hi,
              Would love an opinion on these shots, difficult getting sharp 1600px shots now that I've edited well over a hundred exclusively at 1280. Also is the last shot technically backlit?
              Best,
              Taylor
              Click image for larger version

Name:	G-JZBK1600.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	998.5 KB
ID:	1163744Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EGL1600.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	901.3 KB
ID:	1163743Click image for larger version

Name:	OY-ASB1600.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	609.0 KB
ID:	1163741Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-EKS1600.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	574.6 KB
ID:	1163740Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZTT1600.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	1,013.5 KB
ID:	1163742

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
                Hi,
                Would love an opinion on these shots, difficult getting sharp 1600px shots now that I've edited well over a hundred exclusively at 1280. Also is the last shot technically backlit?
                1. soft
                2. dark/harsh contrast
                3. dark, overprocessed
                4. borderline dark/harsh contrast
                5. soft, yes technically backlit

                Comment


                • Hi,
                  Are the following late evening shots acceptable? For some reason there's a darker spot at the bottom left on the dust removal screen in some of them, is it a problem that would get the shots rejected?
                  Thanks,
                  Taylor

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-DES1600_1.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	713.7 KB
ID:	1164063Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-ICD1600_1.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	829.6 KB
ID:	1164064Click image for larger version

Name:	G-UZHZ1600.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	871.9 KB
ID:	1164065Click image for larger version

Name:	F-GPYN1600_1.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	876.7 KB
ID:	1164066Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-ICD1600_2.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	557.0 KB
ID:	1164067 (dust removal screen for image 4, this is with lens corrections enabled which usually leaves a clean image)

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
                    Hi,
                    Are the following late evening shots acceptable? For some reason there's a darker spot at the bottom left on the dust removal screen in some of them, is it a problem that would get the shots rejected?
                    Dark/harsh contrast.

                    Comment


                    • Hi,
                      Wanting to delete the current shot I have of this registration in favour of a 1920px one to use as my banner. Just wondering if the quality is acceptable.
                      Thanks,
                      Taylor

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	92-03641920.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1165025

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
                        Hi,
                        Wanting to delete the current shot I have of this registration in favour of a 1920px one to use as my banner. Just wondering if the quality is acceptable.
                        Borderline soft.

                        Comment


                        • Hi,
                          Would the following shot count as a hot photo simply for the matching tails?
                          Best,
                          Taylor

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	CSX552231920.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1165688

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
                            Hi,
                            Would the following shot count as a hot photo simply for the matching tails?
                            Is it the first time this scheme appears on the DB?

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                              Is it the first time this scheme appears on the DB?
                              No, so I'm guessing not.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post

                                No, so I'm guessing not.
                                Your guess would be correct.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X