Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Max Baillie - Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Max B View Post
    I took quite a few photos in this sort of lighting/setting recently, is this alright for a submission?
    Would be ok for me.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

      Would be ok for me.
      Thanks! Really happy I'm finally getting the hang of this lol

      Comment


      • #48
        Hi, would this be rejected for contrast/colour?
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Max B View Post
          Hi, would this be rejected for contrast/colour?
          Colour no, contrast quite possibly.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Colour no, contrast quite possibly.
            OK, is it too high or too low? Or is it the partly cloudy lighting?

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Max B View Post

              OK, is it too high or too low? Or is it the partly cloudy lighting?
              Weak contrast due to overcast conditions.

              Comment


              • #52
                Hi, I've just seen the new BA A320 in the Oneworld livery, but I haven't uploaded a pic in a while. Is there anything that needs fixing here?
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Max B View Post
                  Hi, I've just seen the new BA A320 in the Oneworld livery, but I haven't uploaded a pic in a while. Is there anything that needs fixing here?
                  Not a screener, so may not be right.

                  Bad processing with healing tools: they are very visible in the check for dust tool.
                  Click image for larger version  Name:	image.png Views:	0 Size:	293.4 KB ID:	1173490
                  Also, too far (crop closer), soft, vignetting.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by 787Dream View Post

                    Not a screener, so may not be right.

                    Bad processing with healing tools: they are very visible in the check for dust tool.
                    Click image for larger version Name:	image.png Views:	0 Size:	293.4 KB ID:	1173490
                    Also, too far (crop closer), soft, vignetting.
                    I did no healing, but it may be the post processing, as I added a small amount of saturation after resizing, the softness and crop can be easily fixed and I'm not sure how there's vignetting given that I cropped it quite far and have never had vignetting with the lens before even with no cropping.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Thanks for pointing out those things, I ended up picking a different file which was sharper originally. The 'healing tool' issue turned out to be the Camera Raw post processing, and I tried to minimise the vignette and up the sharpness after resizing, as well as cropping this file tighter. Are there still some issues which need adjusting?
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Max B View Post
                        Thanks for pointing out those things, I ended up picking a different file which was sharper originally. The 'healing tool' issue turned out to be the Camera Raw post processing, and I tried to minimise the vignette and up the sharpness after resizing, as well as cropping this file tighter. Are there still some issues which need adjusting?
                        Oversatured, oversharpened, and still badly overprocessed. Something you are doing is adding massive editing halos.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X