Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oojiflip - Sharpening & Prescreening

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by flyetty View Post

    rudder/tail in sunlight = not backlit, great photo man!
    yeah, amazing photo
    Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
    If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
    ——————————————————————————

    Comment


    • #32
      I'm happy with the answers from the other commenters on that one, is this shot useable/recoverable?
      Probably my favourite ever but not sure if the light can work.
      Click image for larger version

Name:	PEAK1885-Enhanced-NR-2-Edit.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	439.4 KB
ID:	1180687

      Comment


      • #33
        looks ok to me, maybye a bit soft, and a truly amazing shot
        Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
        If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
        ——————————————————————————

        Comment


        • #34
          ​Hi,
          Are the following shots usable in any way or would they be immediately rejected because of the light? Also would the removed CFTs from the F-15E in the last shot be hot?
          Thanks.
          Click image for larger version  Name:	PEAK2849-Enhanced-NR-2-Edit.jpg Views:	0 Size:	654.0 KB ID:	1181227Click image for larger version  Name:	PEAK1885-Enhanced-NR-2-Edit.jpg Views:	0 Size:	439.4 KB ID:	1181228 Click image for larger version

Name:	PEAK4163-Enhanced-NR-2-Edit.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	463.9 KB
ID:	1181229

          Comment


          • #35
            1- looks soft/blurry
            2 might be OK
            Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
            If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
            ——————————————————————————

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
              ​Hi,
              Are the following shots usable in any way or would they be immediately rejected because of the light? Also would the removed CFTs from the F-15E in the last shot be hot?
              All images soft to varying degrees. Not hot.

              Comment


              • #37
                Hi,
                Wondering if these would be uploadable for the same airframe. If both aren't permissible, which has the better chance of making it to FR24?
                Cheers
                Click image for larger version

Name:	JP1920px-6.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	1.27 MB
ID:	1184524Click image for larger version

Name:	JP1920px-9.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1184525

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
                  Hi,
                  Wondering if these would be uploadable for the same airframe. If both aren't permissible, which has the better chance of making it to FR24?
                  Yes, they are similar. Please pick one.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Hi,
                    Wondering if the motion blur on the subject due to the lower shutter is permissible?
                    Cheers
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP1920px-19.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	1,022.8 KB
ID:	1184671

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
                      Hi,
                      Wondering if the motion blur on the subject due to the lower shutter is permissible?
                      Cheers
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	JP1920px-19.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	1,022.8 KB
ID:	1184671
                      Maybe blurry rejection due tail area blurry. subjective.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
                        Hi,
                        Wondering if the motion blur on the subject due to the lower shutter is permissible?
                        It is not.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X