If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!
Rene, this image shows the points where the baseline arrows need to be moved in to.
The Overprocessed part refers to the slight haloes around the fin and the wings. When you process first create a background layer.
Then go through your processing and finally, delete the sky to show an unprocessed sky behind the layer. Flatten the image and save.
Thankyou so much for that, never used background layers or tried deleting the sky before (surely that would make for a dark image or atleast count as a night shot)
Seems I'm about to enter a whole new world of editing
Thanks again mate
Regards
René
I have to say I'm pretty happy with this batch of mine that just went through.
Although this was the only one rejected.
For dust spots. I looked at it and found the one at the top. Is that the only one?
I have to say I'm pretty happy with this batch of mine that just went through.
Although this was the only one rejected.
For dust spots. I looked at it and found the one at the top. Is that the only one?
I've had this one rejected, for contrast and horizon. Yet it was actually a misty morning, and the histogram is round about right?
Also I can't get my head round the horizon as their is no true horizontal or vertical horizon at EMA given the threshold and terminal there's a 40 foot difference between the two.
I've had this one rejected, for contrast and horizon. Yet it was actually a misty morning, and the histogram is round about right?
Also I can't get my head round the horizon as their is no true horizontal or vertical horizon at EMA given the threshold and terminal there's a 40 foot difference between the two.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Ryan
Here's what I see, not sure if it's entirely accurate though
IF your not sure how accurate it is, why are you posting?
Like Paul said, I was only trying to help and I can see clearly the reason for rejection. I mention accuracy because I am not a screener and do not utilize their tools; I will leave it up to the staff to tell you what needs to be done.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment