If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!
I don't think it needs much and I just don't want to risk over-sharpening!
Why afraid of overdoing it? Just try some 60% 0,2 and if you see jaggies just undo the last action. Or create a layer, sharpen, erase the oversharpen parts and flatten. Or selectively sharpen details.
I like this Pam. There is a brush specifically for sharpening. If some parts of the A/C are sharper than others, just use the brush selectively on the soft spots
- Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)
- Dark / Underexposed
I centered this image with the 4 subdivision in photoshop, what I do with every image. Personally I think this image is not that dark, maybe a +0.03 exposure to add?
- Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)
- Dark / Underexposed
I centered this image with the 4 subdivision in photoshop, what I do with every image. Personally I think this image is not that dark, maybe a +0.03 exposure to add?
TIA
Michel,
She is a bit to high in the frame.
And if I look at your other shots of that day she looks a bit to dark. She could do with some more exposure.
“The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”
Right then. Here's my version. The major problem was the noise in the sky which cameras of the type that you use tend to create and I have used Noise Ninja to deal with that. You chose to use a 4:3 crop 1024x768 when a 3:2 crop 1024x683 would have been more appropriate and would have reduced the amount of uninteresting sky and foreground. I have processed to the 4:3 crop that you used.
Other than the NoiseNinja noise reduction it didn't require a huge amount of processing in Photoshop CS3. I reduced some noise on the fuselage but to a lower level than that used on the sky. I sharpened overall two times at 50_0.2_0 and then gave the Phillipines title and the fuselage logo a further two shots of the same as selective sharpening.
The image is not that sharp to start with and I think the compression on the aircraft that you produced was more a case of oversharpening on a small image.
Anyway...try this one if you wish...
Just got the results from this one and it got slammed with reject reasons!
"- Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
- Overexposed
- JPG compression artefacts"
Guess the bottom line is this photo is just not going to work. Bummer, thanks for the help though!
Sankalp,
Yes ceiling is over sharpened - Pic is leaning to the right a bit too, so CCW rotation is needed. The outside are also overexposed and last, you're not supposed to show recognizable faces on that kind of shot.
One for the personal collection.
Regards
Alex
Here is a couple the baffled me:
The Qantas it is a night shot reject for backlit.
And the Fedex interior is another reject for - Dark / Underexposed
- Horizon unlevel.
The tail is in a backlit condition. Read the upload guidelines which clearly states that as a general rule of thumb if the tail is backlit the aircraft is also backlit.
How do you tell if it is backlit well the sun will be on either side of the vertical stabilizer.If the sun is directly on top, and due to the shape of the vertical stabilizer there will be some light on the leading edge and about 1/8th of the way aft from the leading edge. Your shot the tail is completely in shadow so it is backlit. End of argument. If you would like me to show you a picture of a aircraft that has the sun on the top and on the nose I am more than happy to show you and prove my point. I am not trying to be nasty more point out that what backlit really means to everyone.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment