Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!

[indian airlines]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=582602
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=582610
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=582612

How are we adding Airport shots to the DB now?

They made new rules for airport shots. Check out this thread:

http://www.jetphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=23441

[kcmh]

Thanks Tanuj

[seahawk]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=589672

I would understand bad cropping (perharps) but part of the subjet cut-off/missing ??

Any help would be apreciated.

[JeffinDEN]

I would understand bad cropping (perharps) but part of the subjet cut-off/missing ??

Same thing. It's just a bad angle. You should of went wide an got the whole plane in, or went tight when you had it oblique. Drawing attention to the bird doesn't help anything either. What's up with that? Most would assume you want people to look at the airplane.

[seahawk]

But I got comparable perspectives accepted.

[Simpleboy]

I tried cropping a lot closer, removing the brid and getting closer to the landing gear. Came up with this.

[seahawk]

Yes, that looks better. Thank you.

[JeffinDEN]

But I got comparable perspectives accepted.

I don't doubt it. It's not a great angle, but if it's what you like...........

[Genessee]

I was wondering, is it better to have an slightly unlevel horizon and straight lines on the runway and taxi ways? or would it be better to have the horizon level and sloped lines for the runway/taxi way?

[LX-A343]

Make the pic look level. If you have lines, which should be level (for example a building), then these have first priority.

Gerardo

[Genessee]

I've been looking at one that was rejected, it should have been correct the first time.

I leveled the picture so the runways were level, the rest looked ok too. (it was rejected :P) There's a tower in the background. I'm not sure why I didn't use it to level things off. Though when the tower is level, the fence slopes downward and doesn't look right.


Live and learn I guess, unless a screener beats me to death first, "So, you like the picture eh? *SMACK*"

Edit: After comparing the fixed picture with the original, the difference is like night and day.

[seahawk]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=603186

You mean vertically - right ?

[sluger020889]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=620868

Yeah I can't seem to get this one right. I believe it's a good shot and has a chance at getting in but things go wrong in the processing, more specifically sharpening I'm guessing. Any ideas????

[Leftseat86]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=620868

Yeah I can't seem to get this one right. I believe it's a good shot and has a chance at getting in but things go wrong in the processing, more specifically sharpening I'm guessing. Any ideas????

Compression, noise, grain, soft under sharpened and over-sharpened at the same time.


Without the original we can't help.

[fallingeese]

Compression, noise, grain, soft under sharpened and over-sharpened at the same time.

Without the original we can't help.

I don't think the original is going to help...