Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Finally some decent light with a decent plane! How are these shots? In particular, how is the exposure. I've had a couple of rejections lately due to the midtones being a little too dark. Also, 4 and 5 are very similar, but would just like an opinion as to what one is best - 4 is a better angle although 5 appears to be 'cleaner'/less background clutter. Thank you very much!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N147UP_KMCO_3503.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	532.7 KB
ID:	1017810
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N78511_KMCO_3497.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	333.3 KB
ID:	1017811
    Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-82027_KMCO_3516.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	530.7 KB
ID:	1017812
    Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-82027_KMCO_3536.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	419.3 KB
ID:	1017813
    Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-82027_KMCO_3540.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	440.1 KB
ID:	1017814

    Leave a comment:


  • ninadranade
    replied
    Dear Team,

    Please let me know if this is passable.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N793XJ_10_12.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	837.6 KB
ID:	1017809

    Thanks,
    Ninad

    Leave a comment:


  • Ivan Jimenez Rojas
    replied
    Good, he would be so kind to give me an opinion of these shots. Thank you very much.!
    1Click image for larger version

Name:	13102017-DSC_1320.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	546.2 KB
ID:	1017807 2Click image for larger version

Name:	13102017-DSC_1376.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	605.7 KB
ID:	1017808

    Leave a comment:


  • pauwelsc
    replied
    Thoughts on these ones? I am not sure about the Aer Lingus, I hope you can prove me wrong. I equalised all the pictures and in my opinion, no halos detected... Thanks!

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-DVH.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	942.8 KB
ID:	1017801 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-FML.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.30 MB
ID:	1017802 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZOR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.57 MB
ID:	1017803 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	g-zbav.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.13 MB
ID:	1017804 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	oo-snf.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	983.1 KB
ID:	1017805

    Leave a comment:


  • Degupukas
    replied
    hi jp team
    What about now
    color that's ok?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n670cp-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	792.0 KB
ID:	1017796

    dark?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	msp005-jp.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	747.1 KB
ID:	1017797

    color/contrast?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	xa-mto-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	546.2 KB
ID:	1017798

    prescreen
    Click image for larger version

Name:	hp-1764pst-jp.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	416.7 KB
ID:	1017799 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-azt-jp.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	578.1 KB
ID:	1017800

    Dlowwa thanks for your time

    Leave a comment:


  • gabrielmagacho
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    A bit dark/flat, but probably ok.

    Backlit no, but dark/contrast/obstruction, yes.
    Thank you again Dlowwa. It looks better now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	PP-SCN CORRIGIDA DLOWWA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	468.6 KB
ID:	1017792Click image for larger version

Name:	PR-ONL CORRIGIDA DLOWWA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	460.5 KB
ID:	1017793Click image for larger version

Name:	pr-gxq CORRIGIDA DLOWWA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	441.2 KB
ID:	1017794

    Leave a comment:


  • crisquijano
    replied
    First of all, a big thank you to all the JP crew members.

    Please provide your opinion on these ones. thank you

    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	COPA_HP-1536CMP_17SEP17_1200_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	581.4 KB
ID:	1017789
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	Condor_D-ABUB_16JAN17_1200_paralela.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	912.0 KB
ID:	1017790

    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	SOUTHWEST_N7731A_17SEP17_1200_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	705.7 KB
ID:	1017791
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	UNITED_N35204_17SEP17_1200_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	563.0 KB
ID:	1017795
    5.Click image for larger version

Name:	TACA N684TA 12MAR17 1600 charol.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	913.9 KB
ID:	1017806

    Leave a comment:


  • ninadranade
    replied
    Thanks Dana !

    Leave a comment:


  • pauwelsc
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Ok for me.
    Thanks for doing all the pre-screens! It must be a lot of work...

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thanks for the feedback dlowwa!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
    What about now?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9873[/ATTACH]
    Ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • pauwelsc
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. contrast
    2. borderline contrast
    3. soft
    4. soft/blurry
    5. borderline contrast

    1. borderline soft
    2. soft, horizon
    3. ok
    4. backlit
    5. ok
    What about now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FEAK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1017785

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gabrielmagacho View Post
    JP Crew, could you pre-screen these photos?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9858[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9859[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9860[/ATTACH]
    A bit dark/flat, but probably ok.

    Originally posted by gabrielmagacho View Post
    Btw, these photos would be rejected by backlit?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9861[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9862[/ATTACH]
    Backlit no, but dark/contrast/obstruction, yes.

    Originally posted by MadridSpotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9868[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9869[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9870[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9871[/ATTACH]

    Would these be OK? The aircraft were passing over the sea, so they have some kind of tint.
    Contrast is too low for all of them. Also a bit soft.

    Originally posted by ninadranade View Post
    Hi Team,

    Please let me know if this is passable.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9872[/ATTACH]

    Thanks,
    Ninad
    Soft, and color looks a little oversaturated.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Degupukas View Post
    hello JP team please prescreen
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9835[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9836[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9839[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9840[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9866[/ATTACH]
    thanks
    1. ok
    2. color
    3. dark
    4. ok
    5. color/contrast

    Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
    What about now, dlowwa?

    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9842[/ATTACH]

    and this one? I took in dusk time

    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9843[/ATTACH]
    1. contrast still low
    2. soft/blurry

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by crisquijano View Post
    Hello JP Crew. Please check this image for me. Thank you.

    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9820[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9821[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9822[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9833[/ATTACH]
    5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9834[/ATTACH]
    1. contrast
    2. borderline contrast
    3. soft
    4. soft/blurry
    5. borderline contrast

    Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
    Looking forward to your opinion! Thanks

    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9828[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9829[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9830[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9831[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9832[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline soft
    2. soft, horizon
    3. ok
    4. backlit
    5. ok

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X