New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

[dlowwa]

Hello
This photo is ok ?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8020[/ATTACH]

Thank you!

A little bit noisy, but not quite bad enough to reject for me.

[dlowwa]

Hello, what do you think about these?
Thanks in advance
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8016[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8017[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8018[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8019[/ATTACH]

First is a little yellow, and I'd probably try at a smaller size than 1600.

Other three are very borderline for contrast/poor light. Looks like might be a little blur on a couple as well, so the advice from above to submit at a smaller resolution like 1200 pix would also apply.

[71sbeetle]

No pic yet but I hope it's OK to post this question here
Is an aircraft accident/incident picture considered hot?
No one got hurt, just an airplane left with no brakes and no chocks plowed thru a fence at a local airport
I'm about to put the pics on my computer but I was curious if I should upload as "hot" or not

[dlowwa]

No pic yet but I hope it's OK to post this question here
Is an aircraft accident/incident picture considered hot?
No one got hurt, just an airplane left with no brakes and no chocks plowed thru a fence at a local airport
I'm about to put the pics on my computer but I was curious if I should upload as "hot" or not

Without seeing the images, yes, most likely would be considered hot.

[71sbeetle]

Without seeing the images, yes, most likely would be considered hot.

Thank you, sorry I just got around to it, here is the image:

[dlowwa]

Thank you, sorry I just got around to it, here is the image:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8021[/ATTACH]

Hi, I discussed it with the senior screeners, and we decided that it wasn't quite newsworthy enough to qualify as hot - but please submit it to the regular queue. Thanks for your understanding!

[pawelm]

Hi,

Would those be considered similar?

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/7909007

thanks

[brianw999]

Hi,

Would those be considered similar?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8022[/ATTACH]

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/7909007

thanks

Not similar for me. Obviously airborne vs obviously on the ground are not similar.

[Ellx]

Hello,
Is this picture ok for upload?
Thank you

[dlowwa]

Hello,
Is this picture ok for upload?
Thank you

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8023[/ATTACH]

Needs to be higher in the frame.

[Ellx]

Needs to be higher in the frame.

thank you for reply.
You mean by higher in the frame, that the placement of the aircraft must be more at the top edge?

[Ellx]

thank you for reply.
You mean by higher in the frame, that the placement of the aircraft must be more at the top edge?

ok I repositioned the aircraft in the picture, is it ok like that?
And what about the sharpness, is it good or too much?
Thank you

[brianw999]

ok I repositioned the aircraft in the picture, is it ok like that?
And what about the sharpness, is it good or too much?
Thank you

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8024[/ATTACH]

That's better. General rule of thumb is to visualise the fuselage as a plain tube and run the centre through that.

[Ellx]

That's better. General rule of thumb is to visualise the fuselage as a plain tube and run the centre through that.

thank you for the reply.

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello!
Is this one ok for upload? Thanks for the help!