New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello.
This one was rejected due to oversharpen, is it ok now? Thanks



Is this one ok? Thanks

[dlowwa]

Got that one rejected for unleveled want to ask if the new one attached is better?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6063339

PS: I think the hangar is leveled but the power pole is not leveled.

The second one is slightly better, but there is not much difference to be honest.

HI JP Team, THANK YOU for all your feedback and time lately. Really appreciate that.

Please check this new set. Thank you!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8777[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8778[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8779[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8780[/ATTACH]

3rd Edit - worked with Histogram to reduce over-exposed areas.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8786[/ATTACH]

1 & 2 - soft
3 - ok
4 & 5 - strong yellow tint
6 - soft
7 - 9 - borderline soft, but passable for me

[dlowwa]

Hello again,

i have done a reedit of some of my pictures. What dou you think, are they better now and good enough for add those to the queue?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8781[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8782[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8785[/ATTACH]

Thanks a lot again for your work and time, i really appreciate that!
Have a nice day!

If I screened these, they would all be rejected for contrast & exposure issues.

Hi!

Need some feeback for this shots. Thanks!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8790[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8791[/ATTACH]

First is a little soft and overexposed, second is borderline for the same, but would be passable for me.

[dlowwa]

Hello.
This one was rejected due to oversharpen, is it ok now? Thanks

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8797[/ATTACH]

Is this one ok? Thanks

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8798[/ATTACH]

First looks ok, second is soft/blurry and dark.

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello dlowwa, can you give me your opinion which of these two is the best for upload? Thanks again for your help.

[ninadranade]

Dear Team,

Can you please check if the below is passable.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/149552016@N06/37114424255/in/dateposted-public/

Thanks for your time !

Thanks,
Ninad

[vcruvinel]

First is a little soft and overexposed, second is borderline for the same, but would be passable for me.

I will correct the exposure from the first. But about the second...I did understand the mean of "borderline for the same". Can you explain for me?

[pdeboer]

Dear Team,

Can you please check if the below is passable.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/149552016@N06/37114424255/in/dateposted-public/

Thanks for your time !

Thanks,
Ninad

Looks acceptable to me.

[Michael]

Please could you direct me of possible proplems with this photo

[Stephan Rossouw]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8805[/ATTACH]
Please could you direct me of possible proplems with this photo

From my phone the composure looks good.

[dlowwa]

Hello dlowwa, can you give me your opinion which of these two is the best for upload? Thanks again for your help.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8800[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8802[/ATTACH]

Second one.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8805[/ATTACH]
Please could you direct me of possible proplems with this photo

There are some editing halos visible, and it is a little too low in the frame.

[dlowwa]

I will correct the exposure from the first. But about the second...I did understand the mean of "borderline for the same". Can you explain for me?

Borderline = could be yes, could be no
The same = second has the same issues (soft, overexposed) as the first

[Michael]

Would like to get these pre screened pleas

[DirtyCrow]

Are these good for upload?
Thank you!

[airbum]

With the current crops, no.



For 2006 and a new reg., the noise might be acceptable, but it is also quite soft.

TKS - only picture I have and it crashed 2 years later. Fingers crossed someone may have a better mage in their file.