Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Can only comment on final edits at upload size. As such, the third has issues with compression, editing halos, oversharpening, and color.



    1 & 5 still borderline dark. 2 & 3 would be rejected for similar.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CSC_0788-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	217.5 KB
ID:	1017071Click image for larger version

Name:	CSC_0793-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	205.7 KB
ID:	1017072Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0100 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	246.9 KB
ID:	1017073

    Comment


    • Originally posted by zac787 View Post
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]9116[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9117[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9118[/ATTACH]
      1. & 2. oversharpened, compression, overprocessed, similar
      3. dark, contrast

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
        Hello, thanks for the help.
        Which of the two is the best?

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]9088[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]9096[/ATTACH]

        Can i also ask your opinion about this one?

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]9089[/ATTACH]
        Hello screeners can you give your opinion about these ones please. Thanks.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
          1. soft
          2. soft
          3. soft, contrast, cut off, overexposed, backlit
          4. soft, cut off, obstruction, horizon, centering



          Quality looks ok to me, but the crop on the first might be an issue. We generally don't like it when the stabilizer is cut off like that.



          Still likely a contrast/dark rejection.
          Thank you dlowwa. I am aware of the preference but several of my accepted photos have the same framing. I'll be willing to run the risk . Thank you for your input, much appreciated.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
            1. soft
            2. soft
            3. soft, contrast, cut off, overexposed, backlit
            4. soft, cut off, obstruction, horizon, centering

            About number #1, see it`s ok now. Thanks dlowwa!

            Click image for larger version

Name:	FAB2101_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	320.8 KB
ID:	1017074

            another one that I did some corrections after JP team comments

            Click image for larger version

Name:	PR-IOB1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	481.2 KB
ID:	1017075

            need some comments in this shots too

            Click image for larger version

Name:	PR_SDT5.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	399.7 KB
ID:	1017076

            Click image for larger version

Name:	PR-HFV.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	492.1 KB
ID:	1017077

            This kind of shot is acceptable?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	PR-IOB2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	444.2 KB
ID:	1017084

            Comment


            • Hello team JP could please prescreen

              Click image for larger version

Name:	n941fd.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	560.8 KB
ID:	1017078 Click image for larger version

Name:	pr-aco.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	427.8 KB
ID:	1017079Click image for larger version

Name:	n915nn-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	987.0 KB
ID:	1017080Click image for larger version

Name:	xa-gol-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	726.3 KB
ID:	1017081

              thanks

              Comment


              • Hi again JP team. Please check these. Thank you

                [1920px]
                Click image for larger version

Name:	BahamasAir_C6-BFE_17SEP17_1920_landing.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1017082

                Click image for larger version

Name:	TAMCargo_PR-ACO_17SEP17_1200_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	577.5 KB
ID:	1017083

                Comment


                • Hi there. Just wanted to know if this pic is acceptable.

                  Thank you

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC0143.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	602.6 KB
ID:	1017086

                  Comment


                  • Dear Team,

                    Please let me mow if this shot is passable.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	N174SY_09_18.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	550.8 KB
ID:	1017087

                    Thanks for your time,

                    Thanks,
                    Ninad

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                      Hello screeners can you give your opinion about these ones please. Thanks.
                      These would be rejected for dark/contrast. The first might have a chance with some brightening and more contrast.

                      Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
                      About number #1, see it`s ok now. Thanks dlowwa!

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]9119[/ATTACH]

                      another one that I did some corrections after JP team comments

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]9120[/ATTACH]

                      need some comments in this shots too

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]9121[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]9122[/ATTACH]

                      This kind of shot is acceptable?

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]9130[/ATTACH]
                      1. some light halos, and starting to look oversharpened in places.
                      2. ok
                      3. a little too low in frame and needs CW rotation
                      4. soft tail, also needs CW
                      5. close crops of engines are ok, but this one has some obstruction and is very soft

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Degupukas View Post
                        Hello team JP could please prescreen

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]9123[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9124[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9125[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9126[/ATTACH]

                        thanks
                        The only one I see any issues with is the second, which has some heat haze and color/contrast issues. The rest should be ok.

                        Originally posted by crisquijano View Post
                        Hi again JP team. Please check these. Thank you

                        [1920px]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]9127[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]9128[/ATTACH]
                        Bit soft for both, but probably ok.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          These would be rejected for dark/contrast. The first might have a chance with some brightening and more contrast.



                          1. some light halos, and starting to look oversharpened in places.
                          2. ok
                          3. a little too low in frame and needs CW rotation
                          4. soft tail, also needs CW
                          5. close crops of engines are ok, but this one has some obstruction and is very soft
                          Many thanks for the feedback, I will upload #2 and correct (if possible) the others. Thanks!

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Pta Aviation View Post
                            Hi there. Just wanted to know if this pic is acceptable.

                            Thank you

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]9132[/ATTACH]
                            I think so, yes.

                            Originally posted by ninadranade View Post
                            Dear Team,

                            Please let me mow if this shot is passable.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]9133[/ATTACH]

                            Thanks for your time,

                            Thanks,
                            Ninad
                            Should also be ok.

                            Comment


                            • Hello team JP could please prescreen
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bhm.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	414.0 KB
ID:	1017089 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bhl.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	847.8 KB
ID:	1017090Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bdw.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	769.2 KB
ID:	1017091 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bcx-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	732.8 KB
ID:	1017092 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bab.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	855.3 KB
ID:	1017093
                              thanks a lot

                              Comment


                              • I forgot to ask prescreen for this two:

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	PR_MYB2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	641.5 KB
ID:	1017094
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	FAB2004.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	663.1 KB
ID:	1017097

                                Thanks

                                Shots with some corrections;

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	PR-HFV.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	505.8 KB
ID:	1017095

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	FAB2101_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	249.8 KB
ID:	1017096

                                About the Sideral:

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	PR_SDT5.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	399.7 KB
ID:	1017076

                                With my image there is no way to centralize more. Try with this one (after correct the others issues) or not even try?

                                About the engine shot. I think there is no way to get out the stairs (obstructions). Try to improve the sharpness and upload or save in my personal gallery?

                                Thanks

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X