Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

YanS - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    Today these pictures were rejected for being backlit:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    The first one is borderline for me too but as pretty much of the fuselage is lit and as it was OK in pre-screening (which is no guarantee of course) it would be discussable in my eyes.

    The second one looks ok in terms of light in my opinion.

    But of course these are only personal views so I ask here if one of them (or both) would be worth an appeal.

    Thanks for your help,
    Best regards
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    A feedback on these would be great
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22404[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22405[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22406[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22407[/ATTACH]
    5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22408[/ATTACH]

    I'm not totally sure about horizon on all of these.

    Thanks for your answers,
    best Regards,
    Yannick
    Last one needs tighter crop on right, otherwise can't see any major issues with the horizon or otherwise.

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    A feedback on these would be great
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1294v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1033436
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1251v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1033437
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1311v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,022.4 KB
ID:	1033438
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0920v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,001.9 KB
ID:	1033439
    5.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1384v3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.21 MB
ID:	1033440

    I'm not totally sure about horizon on all of these.

    Thanks for your answers,
    best Regards,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    A pre-screening for these would be nice.

    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22182[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22183[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22184[/ATTACH] ( not sure about contrast here)
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22185[/ATTACH] ( not sure about exposure)
    5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22186[/ATTACH] ( I don't know if the composition/crop works good enough)

    Thanks for your replies,
    All the best,
    Yannick

    PS: Is it generally ok (or even good) when we add a specific aspect to the picture that we are not sure about in pre-screeing?
    3 & 5 maybe a touch soft, otherwise ok. Asking about specific concerns is fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    A pre-screening for these would be nice.

    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0859v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1033250
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1125v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1033251
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1184v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	816.9 KB
ID:	1033252 ( not sure about contrast here)
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1244v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1033253 ( not sure about exposure)
    5.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1461v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,021.7 KB
ID:	1033254 ( I don't know if the composition/crop works good enough)

    Thanks for your replies,
    All the best,
    Yannick

    PS: Is it generally ok (or even good) when we add a specific aspect to the picture that we are not sure about in pre-screeing?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    Thanks, dlowwa, sounds good. I'll give them a chance.

    A feedback on these would be great aswell:
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22103[/ATTACH] (not sure about contrast here)
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22104[/ATTACH] (I had to remove some dust here, I hope, it's ok)
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22105[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22106[/ATTACH] ( not sure about horizon here)
    5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22107[/ATTACH] ( would be borderline contrast/backlit for me and I think the colour looks a bit off too...)

    Thanks for your help,
    Have a good day,
    Yannick
    1. yes, borderline contrast
    2. see something below the nose, but not really that visible
    3. ok
    4. dark, borderline cut off for cropping tug
    5. yes, backlit

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    Thanks, dlowwa, sounds good. I'll give them a chance.

    A feedback on these would be great aswell:
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1315v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	700.6 KB
ID:	1033184 (not sure about contrast here)
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1326v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	811.4 KB
ID:	1033185 (I had to remove some dust here, I hope, it's ok)
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1526v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1033186
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1535v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1033187 ( not sure about horizon here)
    5.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1575v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.15 MB
ID:	1033188 ( would be borderline contrast/backlit for me and I think the colour looks a bit off too...)

    Thanks for your help,
    Have a good day,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    A pre-screening for these five would be nice:

    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22071[/ATTACH] ( not sure about centering and horizon here)
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22072[/ATTACH] ( I had to remove some dust, hope it's ok)
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22073[/ATTACH] ( borderline contrast for me)
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22074[/ATTACH] ( very borderline backlit I think but on the other hand pretty much of the fuselage is lit... not sure )
    5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]22075[/ATTACH] ( not sure about horizon)

    Thanks for your help,
    Best regards,
    Yannick
    Would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    A pre-screening for these five would be nice:

    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0915v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1033154 ( not sure about centering and horizon here)
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0959v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	733.0 KB
ID:	1033155 ( I had to remove some dust, hope it's ok)
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1467v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1033156 ( borderline contrast for me)
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1486v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1033157 ( very borderline backlit I think but on the other hand pretty much of the fuselage is lit... not sure )
    5.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1562v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1033158 ( not sure about horizon)

    Thanks for your help,
    Best regards,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    would the control-tower-picture need 'Airport-overview'-category?

    Thanks for your help,
    best regards,
    Yannick
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    would the control-tower-picture need 'Airport-overview'-category?

    Thanks for your help,
    best regards,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    Thanks dolowwa for your answer. I'll give them a chance.

    A feedback on these would be nice:
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21905[/ATTACH] (I had to remove some dust right over the visible contrail but I didn' want to damage the contrail. I hope it's ok this way.)
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21906[/ATTACH]

    Thanks for your replies,
    Best regards,
    Yannick
    Second one might need a touch of CCW, but quality looks ok for both.

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    Thanks dolowwa for your answer. I'll give them a chance.

    A feedback on these would be nice:
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0766v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	907.7 KB
ID:	1033017 (I had to remove some dust right over the visible contrail but I didn' want to damage the contrail. I hope it's ok this way.)
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0694 1v3.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1033018

    Thanks for your replies,
    Best regards,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    I tried to improve no. 3 now:
    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]21833[/ATTACH] ( I think it's now bright enough but I'm afraid it's too soft now )

    ...And a new one for pre-screening:
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21834[/ATTACH]


    Thanks for your answers,
    All the best,
    Yannick

    PS: feel free to ignore the Piper for now, I attached it accidently and a 6th image would be out of the 24h limit
    Both look acceptable to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    I tried to improve no. 3 now:
    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0753v5.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	982.4 KB
ID:	1032957 ( I think it's now bright enough but I'm afraid it's too soft now )

    ...And a new one for pre-screening:
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0710v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,009.7 KB
ID:	1032958


    Thanks for your answers,
    All the best,
    Yannick

    PS: feel free to ignore the Piper for now, I attached it accidently and a 6th image would be out of the 24h limit
    Attached Files
    Last edited by YanS; 2019-02-17, 11:17. Reason: added PS

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X