vcruvinel - Editing advice

[vcruvinel]

There is a cyan cast to the image. Adding red will remove it.

Dana, many thanks for your reply. I add a bit more red to the left side (just to compare). See the image attached.



Do you think this is enough? I also put more constrast in the left side.

Thanks!

Vinicius Cruvinel

[dlowwa]

Dana, many thanks for your reply. I add a bit more red to the left side (just to compare). See the image attached.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14226[/ATTACH]

Do you think this is enough? I also put more constrast in the left side.

Thanks!

Vinicius Cruvinel

Better, but still borderline for me. Don't think you want to add any more contrast.

[vcruvinel]

Dana,

Thanks for your reply. I have a batch of photos from this day and place with the same problem with cyan cast.

I did another version with more red in the left side. Sorry to take days and your time with the same photo but I need to learn and understand the balance between the colors to solve this issues.



Thanks as aways.

Vinicius

[dlowwa]

Dana,

Thanks for your reply. I have a batch of photos from this day and place with the same problem with cyan cast.

I did another version with more red in the left side. Sorry to take days and your time with the same photo but I need to learn and understand the balance between the colors to solve this issues.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14253[/ATTACH]

Thanks as aways.

Vinicius

Looks better I supposed, but don't go too far. Maybe something in between the two versions.

[vcruvinel]

Looks better I supposed, but don't go too far. Maybe something in between the two versions.

Dana,

Find attached again a new version, between the first and second test I did. Let`s see it looks better now!



Many Thanks!

Vinicius

[dlowwa]

Dana,

Find attached again a new version, between the first and second test I did. Let`s see it looks better now!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14259[/ATTACH]

Many Thanks!

Vinicius

Left side is better on this one.

[vcruvinel]

Dana, many thanks for your feedback in the last days. I corrected the color and sent again to the queue.

Can you please provide some feedback in this two shots?

#1.
#2.

Thanks!

Vinicius

[dlowwa]

Dana, many thanks for your feedback in the last days. I corrected the color and sent again to the queue.

Can you please provide some feedback in this two shots?

#1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]14283[/ATTACH]
#2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]14284[/ATTACH]

Thanks!

Vinicius

Very slight softness/heat haze visible on both, but I think should be passable.

[vcruvinel]

Very slight softness/heat haze visible on both, but I think should be passable.

Thanks, Dana. I will put a bit more sharpness to see if looks better and upload after.

Can you please give me some feedback in this shot?

#1.

Many thanks!

Vinicius

[dlowwa]

Thanks, Dana. I will put a bit more sharpness to see if looks better and upload after.

Can you please give me some feedback in this shot?

#1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]14296[/ATTACH]

Many thanks!

Vinicius

Soft, borderline heat hazed. May be fixable.

[vcruvinel]

Soft, borderline heat hazed. May be fixable.

Dana,

I think this composition with the TAP in the background does not looks good because the a/c get a lot of heat haze from the tarmac in the photo, and also the main a/c looks a bit heat hazed.

I changed the photo from the sequence to this one, what do you think?



Thanks,

Vinicius

[dlowwa]

Dana,

I think this composition with the TAP in the background does not looks good because the a/c get a lot of heat haze from the tarmac in the photo, and also the main a/c looks a bit heat hazed.

I changed the photo from the sequence to this one, what do you think?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14308[/ATTACH]

Thanks,

Vinicius

Contrast is a touch harsh, but otherwise ok.

[vcruvinel]

Contrast is a touch harsh, but otherwise ok.

Many thanks for the reply. I reduced a bit the contrast and uploaded the photo.

Today I got this rejection by Underexposed and Similar https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6424579.

I verify the histogram and appears to be balanced, what points can I improve?. About the Similar rejection, as the photo has a different background, angle and date, in which aspect it consider similar with the another (close up view) that I have in the database? just to do not do the same mistake again.

Many Thanks!

Vinicius

[dlowwa]

Many thanks for the reply. I reduced a bit the contrast and uploaded the photo.

Today I got this rejection by Underexposed and Similar https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6424579.

I verify the histogram and appears to be balanced, what points can I improve?. About the Similar rejection, as the photo has a different background, angle and date, in which aspect it consider similar with the another (close up view) that I have in the database? just to do not do the same mistake again.

Many Thanks!

Vinicius

Image is neither too dark, nor similar, given the different dates and crop/angle. It has been added.

[vcruvinel]

Image is neither too dark, nor similar, given the different dates and crop/angle. It has been added.

Thanks for you feedback about the photo. Glad it has been accepted.

I edited one more from this same batch and tried to balance the contrast. Can you please pre screen this photo?



Thanks,

Vinicius