bobh - Editing advice

[bobh]

Hi there,
I got this one rejected for unlevel. To level the photo I used the gap in the wall panels immediately behind the left skid as it looked to be the vertical closest to the centre of the picture. Could someone please suggest a better guide to use.
Many thanks, Bob

[bobh]

I'm also helping a friend who is starting to take photos in Beijing. We have been talking about camera settings and cleaning sensors. Attached is one of his photos that I have tried to edit for him. Would you be able to give me some advice that I can pass onto him?
Any help is very much appreciated

[dlowwa]

I'm also helping a friend who is starting to take photos in Beijing. We have been talking about camera settings and cleaning sensors. Attached is one of his photos that I have tried to edit for him. Would you be able to give me some advice that I can pass onto him?
Any help is very much appreciated

[ATTACH=CONFIG]21019[/ATTACH]

Editing halos present, and color a little yellow. Also would need to remove dust spot(s).

[bobh]

Hi there,
Could I get some advice on the shots below? I uploaded some military museum shots last month and had an awful time with dark rejections. Hopefully this is better...
Any advice gratefully received

[dlowwa]

Hi there,
Could I get some advice on the shots below? I uploaded some military museum shots last month and had an awful time with dark rejections. Hopefully this is better...
Any advice gratefully received

Not a great crop on the second, but the exposure should be acceptable.

[bobh]

Hi there,
I got the following rejected for "Bad motive." Would it be helpful if I uploaded again stating that it was the bomb bay?

Many thanks

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7807629

[dlowwa]

Hi there,
I got the following rejected for "Bad motive." Would it be helpful if I uploaded again stating that it was the bomb bay?

Many thanks

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7807629

I think it's pretty obvious what it is, so adding such comments probably wouldn't help much. It was just a subjective decision that such an angle/composition doesn't quite warrant acceptance.

[bobh]

Hi there,
I uploaded some departure shots at Pudong recently and have had an awful time with "Too much or too little contrast."

The following was accepted (thank you very much)

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9723504

The following were rejected

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8133593

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8129522

Having read some forum posts, am I right in saying that the rejected photos lack contrast? Also, what would be the best way to fix them (if at all possible)?

Also, apologies to dlowwa for not following the site rules. I tried to search for my previous thread, failed and made a booboo.

As always, thank you to all the crew for doing such a great job in helping me to enjoy this hobby

Cheers,
Bob

[dlowwa]

Hi there,
I uploaded some departure shots at Pudong recently and have had an awful time with "Too much or too little contrast."

The following was accepted (thank you very much)

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9723504

The following were rejected

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8133593

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8129522

Having read some forum posts, am I right in saying that the rejected photos lack contrast? Also, what would be the best way to fix them (if at all possible)?

Also, apologies to dlowwa for not following the site rules. I tried to search for my previous thread, failed and made a booboo.

As always, thank you to all the crew for doing such a great job in helping me to enjoy this hobby

Cheers,
Bob

Contrast is too weak on both of them. Sky looks like it was a bit hazy, so not sure how easy that would be to fix.

[bobh]

Hi there,
Would it be possible to have some feedback on the attached photo. I'm still having "fun" working through contrast rejections. Many thanks

[pdeboer]

Hi there,
Would it be possible to have some feedback on the attached photo. I'm still having "fun" working through contrast rejections. Many thanks

Contrast problem on this one, the a/c partly blends in with the background and is rather dark on the underside of the fuselage

[bobh]

Hi there,
I had the photo below rejected for backlit and bad info. I am a bit confused about what info I missed or mistakenly included , if you could let me know I'd be grateful. Also, I'm not sure about it being backlit as the front fuselage does have light, although I admit the rear fuselage might be the reason.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8763400

Any help is gratefully received

[dlowwa]

Hi there,
I had the photo below rejected for backlit and bad info. I am a bit confused about what info I missed or mistakenly included , if you could let me know I'd be grateful. Also, I'm not sure about it being backlit as the front fuselage does have light, although I admit the rear fuselage might be the reason.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8763400

Any help is gratefully received

CN given was incorrect, although I agree, not quite backlit.

[bobh]

Hi, I've had a few rejections recently that I'd appreciate some advice on

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8893398

It was rejected for bad info: location. In a previous rejection I had uploaded it as Inflight China and that was rejected for bad info and stated I should use the airport. Which one is correct?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8899420

This one was rejected as part of the aircraft was cut off. Unfortunately the rest of the aircraft is mostly obscured by a really "well placed" display case. Any thoughts on whether I can salvage this.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8899297

The registration shown is 03-3119 which is used for a C17. Unfortunately the Hendon website shows it registered as 03-3119 while Scramble shows it as a C17.

Thank you for any advice given

Cheers,

Bob

[dlowwa]

It was rejected for bad info: location. In a previous rejection I had uploaded it as Inflight China and that was rejected for bad info and stated I should use the airport. Which one is correct?

First screener was correct. I've added it.

This one was rejected as part of the aircraft was cut off. Unfortunately the rest of the aircraft is mostly obscured by a really "well placed" display case. Any thoughts on whether I can salvage this.

Best I can suggest is check the other accepted images of this aircraft. The most recent ones (with the display) seem to have incorporated the display to include the whole aircraft.

https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/XP299

The registration shown is 03-3119 which is used for a C17. Unfortunately the Hendon website shows it registered as 03-3119 while Scramble shows it as a C17.

Scramble is usually the go-to source, so with conflicting info like that, I can't say which is correct. Multiple other sites also list a C-17 for that serial, so take that for what it is worth.