Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Riadh - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by pdeboer View Post
    First looks overexposed (top washed out) second has a contrast issue (side is not well lit)
    Does 1 look better now? thanksClick image for larger version

Name:	C-FMFZ DSC_3634_1200_3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	602.6 KB
ID:	1029534

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, can you please pre screen these pictures, thanks a lot[ATTACH=CONFIG]17638[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17639[/ATTACH]
    First looks overexposed (top washed out) second has a contrast issue (side is not well lit)

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, can you please pre screen these pictures, thanks a lotClick image for larger version

Name:	C-FMFZ DSC_3634_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	620.5 KB
ID:	1029520Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FQWA 2018AU08 W DSC_4156_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	791.2 KB
ID:	1029521

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    First would be rejected for contrast, color, and soft/blurry. Second should be ok.
    Thanks a lot

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, I am worried about the contrast, what do you think? thanks[ATTACH=CONFIG]17451[/ATTACH] adding 747 thanks[ATTACH=CONFIG]17452[/ATTACH]
    First would be rejected for contrast, color, and soft/blurry. Second should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, I am worried about the contrast, what do you think? thanksClick image for larger version

Name:	N750CR 2018AU03 CYUL DSC_3204_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	399.8 KB
ID:	1029398 adding 747 thanksClick image for larger version

Name:	CN-RGA 2018AU02 CYUL DSC_2873_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	481.6 KB
ID:	1029399

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Done, thank you.
    Would these 2 have a chance? [ATTACH=CONFIG]17379[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17380[/ATTACH]
    1- level using a wall not shown
    1. blown out sky - borderline overexposed/contrast rejection
    2. backlit

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Both look acceptable to me now, but I'd leave a note about the leveling on the first if you submit it.
    Done, thank you.
    Would these 2 have a chance? Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GVCN DSC_2464_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.54 MB
ID:	1029332Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FTAR DSC_2772.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1029333
    1- level using a wall not shown

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    you're wright, and now? 1- used a vertical not shown in the picture (cropped) looks better I think right in between 2- started from the first one with less sharpness than the second
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17357[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17358[/ATTACH]
    Both look acceptable to me now, but I'd leave a note about the leveling on the first if you submit it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. maybe a little too much. conflicting references here , but I'd aim for something in between the two versions.
    2. also maybe a little too much. borderline oversharpened now.
    you're wright, and now? 1- used a vertical not shown in the picture (cropped) looks better I think right in between 2- started from the first one with less sharpness than the second
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FLFU 2018JL28 TRL DSC_2462_1200_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.24 MB
ID:	1029310Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-82089 2018JL29 CYMX DSC_2783_1200_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	825.1 KB
ID:	1029311

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    how about 1 and 3 now? thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17355[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17356[/ATTACH]
    1. maybe a little too much. conflicting references here , but I'd aim for something in between the two versions.
    2. also maybe a little too much. borderline oversharpened now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. horizon (CW)
    2. backlit/contrast
    3. soft
    4. contrast, blurry, motive

    for the last one you are showing neither the aircraft, nor really the location as the motion blur and poor crop don't make sense if that's what you're trying to show.
    how about 1 and 3 now? thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FLFU 2018JL28 TRL DSC_2462_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.23 MB
ID:	1029308Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-82089 2018JL29 CYMX DSC_2783_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	979.0 KB
ID:	1029309

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, Can you please pre screen these one? thank you 4: spotting location
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17325[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17326[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17327[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17328[/ATTACH]
    1. horizon (CW)
    2. backlit/contrast
    3. soft
    4. contrast, blurry, motive

    for the last one you are showing neither the aircraft, nor really the location as the motion blur and poor crop don't make sense if that's what you're trying to show.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, Can you please pre screen these one? thank you 4: spotting location
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FLFU 2018JL28 TRL DSC_2462_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1029283Click image for larger version

Name:	CF-LVD 2018JL28 TRL DSC_2709_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1029284Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-82089 2018JL29 CYMX DSC_2783_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	733.6 KB
ID:	1029285Click image for larger version

Name:	spotting location DSC_6749_1250.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	729.9 KB
ID:	1029286

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by pdeboer View Post
    they both look acceptable to me
    Thank you

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X