Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre Screening Request - Nate Morin

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nathanm04 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23962[/ATTACH]

    I went ahead and let up on the contrast for the 777 pic, not sure if that will do it or if it is not fixable in general?

    Also, are these images that are always coming out too soft fixable or if i do fix it will they be over edited?
    Still very borderline for contrast.

    Adding sharpening, if done correctly, should not lead to over processing issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • nathanm04
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Eva777.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.29 MB
ID:	1034706

    I went ahead and let up on the contrast for the 777 pic, not sure if that will do it or if it is not fixable in general?

    Also, are these images that are always coming out too soft fixable or if i do fix it will they be over edited?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nathanm04 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23955[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23956[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23957[/ATTACH]

    The 777 was taken in challenging conditions but the other two I am also unsure about, thank you very much for all the advice you have for me!
    1. soft, centering
    2, soft, centering, overprocessed
    3. yes, very borderline contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • nathanm04
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N624QX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	891.8 KB
ID:	1034699

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N787SA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1034700

    Click image for larger version

Name:	eva777.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.30 MB
ID:	1034701

    The 777 was taken in challenging conditions but the other two I am also unsure about, thank you very much for all the advice you have for me!

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by nathanm04 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23919[/ATTACH]

    Not too sure if this one is sharp enough, any advice? Thanks!
    Would probably be rejected for blurry.

    Leave a comment:


  • nathanm04
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N219NN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	465.5 KB
ID:	1034665

    Not too sure if this one is sharp enough, any advice? Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nathanm04 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23599[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23600[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23601[/ATTACH]

    Any tips for these? Thank you!
    All three are soft, compressed, and slightly low in the frame. Last two also have light editing halos.

    Leave a comment:


  • nathanm04
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7645 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	643.8 KB
ID:	1034391

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7612 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	454.4 KB
ID:	1034392

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7596 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	546.6 KB
ID:	1034393

    Any tips for these? Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nathanm04 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23496[/ATTACH]

    Not sure what to think of this one, let me know your thoughts?
    Soft, blurry, overprocessed, color (purple fringing).

    Leave a comment:


  • nathanm04
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7562 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	483.5 KB
ID:	1034312

    Not sure what to think of this one, let me know your thoughts?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nathanm04 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23447[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23448[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23449[/ATTACH]

    Last shot for that 1st photo, and wanted to see what you think of the new ones I am attempting to possibly upload.
    All three would be rejected for soft and compression; the third for overprocessed as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • nathanm04
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6587 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	113.1 KB
ID:	1034267

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6344 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	48.6 KB
ID:	1034268

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6155 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	46.9 KB
ID:	1034269

    Last shot for that 1st photo, and wanted to see what you think of the new ones I am attempting to possibly upload.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nathanm04 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23362[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23363[/ATTACH]

    Touched up the first one, and added on the second.. Thank you!
    1. heavy compression
    2. soft/blurry, compression, overprocessed

    Leave a comment:


  • nathanm04
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6587 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	119.7 KB
ID:	1034205

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6383 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	47.3 KB
ID:	1034206

    Touched up the first one, and added on the second.. Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nathanm04 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23312[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23313[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23314[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23315[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23316[/ATTACH]

    Just got back from a spotting trip, let me know if you think these are worth uploading or if I should make any adjustments. Thanks in advance!
    1. borderline soft
    2-5 window reflections and editing halos visible. window reflections are not fixable.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X