Well. First of all I am very happy that the German state secretary (dt.: Außenministerin) Annalena Baerbock has well arrived back in Germany (!) .
And I really didn't feel that it were necessary to open a completely new topic when somebody in Berlin begins a journey which is as I assume a little bit longer
than only Lohausen International (EDDL).
But I was sure that somebody during the past 14 years which I am here on this platform has used the words "poor serviceability" (dt.: armselige Strapazierfähigkeit) in context together
with the German Airforce.
And I am still sure that I back then had no answer for his question "Why is the serviceability so poor in the German Airforce?" . A few seconds ago, I used the jetphotos search engine
somewhere in the upper right corner, but without result. Sadly that very interesting "A340 Argentina" discussion has vanished, probably too long ago.
And today I am the poor guy or better the only guy here on this platform who likes to discuss it again?
Give me a try, and I promise, I'll try to be as gentle as I can, also because between Berlin and Kiev, there are enough aviation problems which both cities try to solve...
Back on topic:
«Wir haben bis zuletzt geprüft und geplant, aber leider war es nicht mehr möglich, die geplanten Reisestationen der Indo-Pazifik-Reise nach dem Ausfall des Flugzeugs der Flugbereitschaft mit den noch verfügbaren Optionen logistisch darzustellen», quotation of the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs (dt.: Außenministerium), verified by ZDF (television) and Die Zeit (newspaper).
In English, partly translated by me.
"At last and until the very last possible moment in time, we tried to find options and we tried to bring the flight planning to an end,
but with the severe technical failure of that aircraft of the German Flugbereitschaft,
we were no longer able to continue the journey to Australia, New Zealand and Fiji."
One rather harmless question must be allowed.
I know that my avatar is not able to fly to Australia nonstop. And I know that Lufthansa is not really able to help, with flight planning and flight routes to Australia.
As Lufthansa simply does not fly to Australia.
And I know how long it would take me, and who am I, probably only - together with Randazzos products - a rather engaged flight simulator enthusiast and aviation enthusiast,
to find a good flight route to Australia, with at least one (technically necessary) stop to refuel the B747 or A340.
After all that, is it clever to continue the flight planning until the very last possible moment in time, without a plan B?
PS: I've heard that one possible option indeed must've been to ask Lufthansa so that the journey could've been continued. If you ask me and my avatar, I had loved that idea.
But there are at least 2 problems: 1. all LH-B744s who I know today are in the air and (probably almost fully) booked with passengers elsewhere.
2. Australia is the one and only continent on planet earth where Lufthansa is not in the air (!).
And I really didn't feel that it were necessary to open a completely new topic when somebody in Berlin begins a journey which is as I assume a little bit longer
than only Lohausen International (EDDL).
But I was sure that somebody during the past 14 years which I am here on this platform has used the words "poor serviceability" (dt.: armselige Strapazierfähigkeit) in context together
with the German Airforce.
And I am still sure that I back then had no answer for his question "Why is the serviceability so poor in the German Airforce?" . A few seconds ago, I used the jetphotos search engine
somewhere in the upper right corner, but without result. Sadly that very interesting "A340 Argentina" discussion has vanished, probably too long ago.
And today I am the poor guy or better the only guy here on this platform who likes to discuss it again?
Give me a try, and I promise, I'll try to be as gentle as I can, also because between Berlin and Kiev, there are enough aviation problems which both cities try to solve...
Back on topic:
«Wir haben bis zuletzt geprüft und geplant, aber leider war es nicht mehr möglich, die geplanten Reisestationen der Indo-Pazifik-Reise nach dem Ausfall des Flugzeugs der Flugbereitschaft mit den noch verfügbaren Optionen logistisch darzustellen», quotation of the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs (dt.: Außenministerium), verified by ZDF (television) and Die Zeit (newspaper).
In English, partly translated by me.
"At last and until the very last possible moment in time, we tried to find options and we tried to bring the flight planning to an end,
but with the severe technical failure of that aircraft of the German Flugbereitschaft,
we were no longer able to continue the journey to Australia, New Zealand and Fiji."
One rather harmless question must be allowed.
I know that my avatar is not able to fly to Australia nonstop. And I know that Lufthansa is not really able to help, with flight planning and flight routes to Australia.
As Lufthansa simply does not fly to Australia.
And I know how long it would take me, and who am I, probably only - together with Randazzos products - a rather engaged flight simulator enthusiast and aviation enthusiast,
to find a good flight route to Australia, with at least one (technically necessary) stop to refuel the B747 or A340.
After all that, is it clever to continue the flight planning until the very last possible moment in time, without a plan B?
PS: I've heard that one possible option indeed must've been to ask Lufthansa so that the journey could've been continued. If you ask me and my avatar, I had loved that idea.
But there are at least 2 problems: 1. all LH-B744s who I know today are in the air and (probably almost fully) booked with passengers elsewhere.
2. Australia is the one and only continent on planet earth where Lufthansa is not in the air (!).
Comment