Originally posted by scottkin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Colgan DHC-8 crashed in Buffalo
Collapse
X
-
The 2nd aircraft behind them on approach, an Embraer 190 reported picking up a good amount of ice for 20 miles inbound. It looks like from the radar returns that the Dash 8 was just heading into an icing prone area in the final minutes before the crash, and it doesn't look like they needed the de-icing systems out of EWR.
So yes, all signs point to icing, but it could still be anything.
Whatever happened, happened very quickly though...in between the handoff from approach to tower, they never called the tower.
Comment
-
I still remember that King Air in Colorado, crashing almost inverted, nose first...with the O.S.U. basket team aboard, killing everyone....the airplane got severe ice at 7,000 ft..!!
I guess some airplane models have a "magnet" for ice accumulation, just wait for the "Perfect Storm" and the basic ingredients for an accident to happen...specially those with a T-tail.
A Former Airdisaster.Com Forum (senior member)....
Comment
-
Originally posted by bobbydee View PostWatching NTSB press conference. Landing gear lowered 1 minute before end of recording. 20 seconds after landing gear deployment, 15 degrees flaps commanded. Immediately after flaps, "Severe pitch and roll excursions."
Edit: I think I answered my own question there. Ice accumulates on the leading edge...would have to be alot of trailing water that made it onto the rear-wing flaps in order to be the catalyst there. Or am I mistaken?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ojexpress View Post12min 39secs into the tape listen to her (the pilot) confirm the new heading 330
now go to 14min 4 secs ATC says turn to heading 310 sounds like she (the pilot) confirms with 210
have a listen - what do you think?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pezzino View PostAsymmetric Flaps deployment? Could that behavior be exacerbated or invoked by icing?
Edit: I think I answered my own question there. Ice accumulates on the leading edge...would have to be alot of trailing water that made it onto the rear-wing flaps in order to be the catalyst there. Or am I mistaken?
Have we heard if the AP was engaged at the time?Don
Standard practice for managers around the world:
Ready - Fire - Aim! DAMN! Missed again!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dmmoore View PostI'm not sure how the Q400's system is activated. Most systems rely on the pilot to activate them after the crew A) notices ice accumulation. B) when the OAT is in the icing range (+10 to -10C) or C) when entering areas of visible moisture.
The plane was directed to descend to 2,300 feet, the Buffalo Niagara airport has altitude of 728ft, so I would guess that the AP was on before the plane stalled.
This was an extremely tragic event and my condolences go out to the families of the victims.
Regards,
Rohan
Comment
-
CNN reports that FAA is reporting pilot attempted to retract gear and reset flaps.
Icing theory seems to be a strong candidate due to those details. Drag from gear could have overwhelmed the diminished aerodynamics of the plane to the point where it was no longer airworthy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rohank4284 View PostI had heard that some Boeing jets, give visual icing warnings, I guess in the case of the Q400's, the plane doesn't give any icing warnings. Since, many JP.net members are claiming that the engines may have fouled with ice, it will definitely be interesting to see if the anti-ice system was on, at the time of the crash.
The plane was directed to descend to 2,300 feet, the Buffalo Niagara airport has altitude of 728ft, so I would guess that the AP was on before the plane stalled.
This was an extremely tragic event and my condolences go out to the families of the victims.
Regards,
Rohan
Comment
-
A similar turboprop jet crash 15 years ago in Indiana was caused by ice, and after that the NTSB recommended more aggressively using pneumatic de-icing boots. But the FAA has not adopted the recommendation. It remains on the NTSB's list of most-wanted safety improvements.
Link
RIP to all involved.
Comment
Comment