Originally posted by reubee
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
LOT Polish Airlines flight LO 016 EWR-WAW Emergency Landing
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostOne thing: we are seeing this as a failure of both the primary and alternative gear systems, and finding it hard to believe both would fail at the same time. But is it possible that the alternative gear system had failed long before this and the fault had gone undetected, and then only revealed when the center hydraulic system failed and they put it to use? How often is this system tested? Could other aircraft have similar unknown failures?
So maybe some sort of electrical failure is involved. However there's also an air driven pump which can power C system.
Comment
-
Evan is quite correct. There is probably a lot of truth in the glider pilots ability to keep things in perspective with the engines out however.
You are used to forced landings since every landing is in essence, a forced landing. Practice is nice but coming into a farm field with instructor or examiner ready give the throttle back is close but not the same.
This fellow did a marvelous job and that does not detract from his performance but how much difference is there between a normal approach and an approach without gear. Probably about 10' or 12 feet?
He had the luxury of a go-round if things did not line up, Sullenberger had no such luck. He was going down.
Regarding the connection with AF 447 .... it's absurd.
Glider pilot or not, the FO would have no shot at night unless he had a very, very, very bright lights and was aware of the situation. Perhaps if the lights of Smolensk were trained on ... I have never even heard of a glider night operation and probably for a good reason.
Regarding foam or no foam, I am surprised that some feel that foam is academic at best. I thought it lessened the friction and reduced the heat and spark potential?Live, from a grassy knoll somewhere near you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by guamainiac View PostHe had the luxury of a go-round if things did not line up, Sullenberger had no such luck.
Comment
-
That picture down under looks not that bad. To me it looks like she might be rebuild and flying again. Is damage like that easy to fix and how long will it take to get her flying or she will never fly again? What you think? Patch her up, put new engines on fix the hydraulics and we are good to go.
Comment
-
I used to know a guy like that. He took out our tow plane in the pattern.
Sadly, he took two other good people with him.
I refused to launch any planes with him anywhere near the pattern (club field), and got grief for it. What he was doing; his final act speaking of loops, he would fly the pattern "hot", do a low high speed pass and into a loop to land.
He never saw the tow plane when he looked down to clear the field prior to his "stunt", it wasn't on the ground, it was at 800 feet and dead ahead of him.
Live, from a grassy knoll somewhere near you.
Comment
-
Nice pic Peter (makes me cringe being a former tin-bender), I guess he burned off and dumped every spare ounce of fuel.
That had got to make you wonder, not second guess or criticize, but wonder what the right thing to do is .. by the book. Dump fuel or leave enough for another pass?
Live, from a grassy knoll somewhere near you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by justLOT787 View PostThat picture down under looks not that bad. To me it looks like she might be rebuild and flying again. Is damage like that easy to fix and how long will it take to get her flying or she will never fly again? What you think? Patch her up, put new engines on fix the hydraulics and we are good to go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter_K View PostVery likely she will fly again but it will take more detailed tests and inspections than just looking at the bottom side and kicking the tires.
I am intrigued what will happen to a composite aircraft such as the 787 in this type situation.
Comment
Comment