Prescreening Request- Herison RK

[HerisonRK]

I had a photo rejected for horizon unlevel. I'm wondering if this new edit is now fine because I've had issues using the right reference for horizon

[dlowwa]

I tried to crop again the second one is this fine now. I'm concerned because of the top of the building that's visible

Centering looks fine to me. Would be ok for me as it is now, but glare along top of fuselage might cause an issue for others.

[HerisonRK]

I tried to crop again the second one is this fine now. I'm concerned because of the top of the building that's visible

[dlowwa]

I have these 2 pictures that I would like prescreened

1. This one I'm not sure if it would get rejected for foreground clutter from the top of the building.

2.

Slight yellow tint on the first, and second is too low in the frame.

[HerisonRK]

I have these 2 pictures that I would like prescreened

1. This one I'm not sure if it would get rejected for foreground clutter from the top of the building.

2.

[HerisonRK]

Poor crop bottom right. Either missed edge, or top of building that looks like an edge.

I've checked the original picture. It was the top of a building. I'll re-crop it and put it on the queue again

[dlowwa]

Hi there,

I got a picture rejection for horizon unlevel and cropping/photo edges/size ratio. (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8818601). Horizon- okay fine I realized my mistake there But I'm not sure why it was rejected for the cropping reason.

Poor crop bottom right. Either missed edge, or top of building that looks like an edge.

[HerisonRK]

Hi there,

I got a picture rejection for horizon unlevel and cropping/photo edges/size ratio. (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8818601). Horizon- okay fine I realized my mistake there But I'm not sure why it was rejected for the cropping reason.

[dlowwa]

Hi all,

I got a picture rejected for contrast (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8772558) but I'm not sure whether the issue is the lack of bright/dark tones or bad shooting conditions.

And I'm not sure about this picture as well whether contrast is acceptable.
1.

I'd consider both borderline for contrast; for both the contrast is a bit weak, which is not helped by the hazy background.

[HerisonRK]

Hi all,

I got a picture rejected for contrast (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8772558) but I'm not sure whether the issue is the lack of bright/dark tones or bad shooting conditions.

And I'm not sure about this picture as well whether contrast is acceptable.
1.

[dlowwa]

Hello all,

I got a photo rejected due to dust spots: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8760003. But when I checked with the dust tool I couldn't find the spots that needed to be edited.

Side note: Happy Late New Years everyone I reached 100 photos on JP during the holidays. I can't say Thank you enough to all the screeners who took the time and helped with the advice through this thread as it helped me get more and more pictures accepted to the database.

That seems to have been a mistake. I've accepted the image now. Happy New Year to you too

[HerisonRK]

Hello all,

I got a photo rejected due to dust spots: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8760003. But when I checked with the dust tool I couldn't find the spots that needed to be edited.

Side note: Happy Late New Years everyone I reached 100 photos on JP during the holidays. I can't say Thank you enough to all the screeners who took the time and helped with the advice through this thread as it helped me get more and more pictures accepted to the database.

[dlowwa]

I'm not sure if there pictures of acceptable. Any advice on how to fix them?

Better sharpening on #3. Don't think the others can be 'fixed'.

[HerisonRK]

I'm not sure if there pictures of acceptable. Any advice on how to fix them?


1.


2.

3.

4.
5.

[dlowwa]

Thanks for the advice. Can I also have this picture prescreened? This is my first picture in years that doesn't show the full aircraft so I'm not sure if it's acceptable.

1.

Likely to be rejected for cut off.