Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pre-screening advice

    Hello!
    I would like to know your opinion about these pictures!
    Thank you. Click image for larger version

Name:	1597439024574.jpg
Views:	288
Size:	505.0 KB
ID:	1096579Click image for larger version

Name:	1597439501425.jpg
Views:	289
Size:	496.9 KB
ID:	1096578Click image for larger version

Name:	1597439025002.jpg
Views:	356
Size:	416.6 KB
ID:	1096577

  • #2
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Hello!
    I would like to know your opinion about these pictures!
    Thank you. Click image for larger version

Name:	1597439024574.jpg
Views:	288
Size:	505.0 KB
ID:	1096579Click image for larger version

Name:	1597439501425.jpg
Views:	289
Size:	496.9 KB
ID:	1096578Click image for larger version

Name:	1597439025002.jpg
Views:	356
Size:	416.6 KB
ID:	1096577
    1. ok
    2. some compression visible
    3. overexposed, overprocessed (editing halos), compression

    Comment


    • #3
      what do you think of these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	1598266346882.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	601.8 KB
ID:	1097421Click image for larger version

Name:	1598266787820.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	463.9 KB
ID:	1097422Click image for larger version

Name:	1598266346521-01.jpeg
Views:	125
Size:	533.7 KB
ID:	1097423Click image for larger version

Name:	1598267448922-01.jpeg
Views:	123
Size:	323.1 KB
ID:	1097424Click image for larger version

Name:	1598266345739-01.jpeg
Views:	125
Size:	637.3 KB
ID:	1097425

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
        what do you think of these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	1598266346882.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	601.8 KB
ID:	1097421Click image for larger version

Name:	1598266787820.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	463.9 KB
ID:	1097422Click image for larger version

Name:	1598266346521-01.jpeg
Views:	125
Size:	533.7 KB
ID:	1097423Click image for larger version

Name:	1598267448922-01.jpeg
Views:	123
Size:	323.1 KB
ID:	1097424Click image for larger version

Name:	1598266345739-01.jpeg
Views:	125
Size:	637.3 KB
ID:	1097425
        All a bit soft, but otherwise no other major issues.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

          All a bit soft, but otherwise no other major issues.
          thanks for the answer, and under which category does the Luftwaffe a319? Military or civilian?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post

            thanks for the answer, and under which category does the Luftwaffe a319? Military or civilian?
            Air Force = military.

            Comment


            • #7
              Click image for larger version

Name:	1599497359327.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	394.0 KB
ID:	1098246Click image for larger version

Name:	1599497358337.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	439.9 KB
ID:	1098247Click image for larger version

Name:	1599497359013.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	432.3 KB
ID:	1098248Click image for larger version

Name:	1599497358686.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	412.9 KB
ID:	1098249Click image for larger version

Name:	1599497357901.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	429.8 KB
ID:	1098250

              Comment


              • #8
                Click image for larger version

Name:	1600706767528.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	452.7 KB
ID:	1099056Click image for larger version

Name:	1600706767860.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	467.4 KB
ID:	1099057Click image for larger version

Name:	1600706766863.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	447.5 KB
ID:	1099058 what do you think of these photos?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	1600706767528.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	452.7 KB
ID:	1099056Click image for larger version

Name:	1600706767860.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	467.4 KB
ID:	1099057Click image for larger version

Name:	1600706766863.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	447.5 KB
ID:	1099058 what do you think of these photos?
                  1, 2) slightly soft and overexposed
                  3) OK
                  My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    What do you think of these photos?
                    will Hainan be cut-off? ​​​​​​ Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204145300 (1).jpg
Views:	72
Size:	489.4 KB
ID:	1099449Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204144967.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	512.7 KB
ID:	1099450Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204144376.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	434.2 KB
ID:	1099451Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204145619.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	557.4 KB
ID:	1099452Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204144646.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	448.6 KB
ID:	1099453

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
                      What do you think of these photos?
                      will Hainan be cut-off? ​​​​​​ Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204145300 (1).jpg
Views:	72
Size:	489.4 KB
ID:	1099449Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204144967.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	512.7 KB
ID:	1099450Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204144376.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	434.2 KB
ID:	1099451Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204145619.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	557.4 KB
ID:	1099452Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204144646.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	448.6 KB
ID:	1099453
                      Don't see any major issues.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Thanks for answering, what about this? Click image for larger version

Name:	1601318517796 (1).jpg
Views:	57
Size:	434.4 KB
ID:	1099563Click image for larger version

Name:	1601317992659 (1).jpg
Views:	56
Size:	558.1 KB
ID:	1099564Click image for larger version

Name:	1601317991253 (1).jpg
Views:	57
Size:	540.8 KB
ID:	1099565

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
                          Thanks for answering, what about this? Click image for larger version

Name:	1601318517796 (1).jpg
Views:	57
Size:	434.4 KB
ID:	1099563Click image for larger version

Name:	1601317992659 (1).jpg
Views:	56
Size:	558.1 KB
ID:	1099564Click image for larger version

Name:	1601317991253 (1).jpg
Views:	57
Size:	540.8 KB
ID:	1099565
                          Slightly oversharpened, but otherwise ok.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Thanks for the last answer. What do you think of these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838799928.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	397.1 KB
ID:	1099920Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838799312.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	410.3 KB
ID:	1099921Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838798902.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	419.7 KB
ID:	1099922Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838801161.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	456.6 KB
ID:	1099923Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838801506.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	715.5 KB
ID:	1099924

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
                              Thanks for the last answer. What do you think of these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838799928.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	397.1 KB
ID:	1099920Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838799312.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	410.3 KB
ID:	1099921Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838798902.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	419.7 KB
ID:	1099922Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838801161.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	456.6 KB
ID:	1099923Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838801506.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	715.5 KB
ID:	1099924
                              There are issues with softness, compression, and editing halos on most of them, and #2 also has poor contrast.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X