Pre-screening Advice for LewisW295 Please

[LewisW295]

People asking reasonable, honest, or sincere questions never get sworn at

Even at that, for worse I'd only shake my head and move on to the next. No need to get angry about anything here.

And this is why I like jetphotos

Thanks for the feedback bud.

[dlowwa]

1. borderline contrast (would be a rejection for me)
2. contrast
3. yes, backlit

People asking reasonable, honest, or sincere questions never get sworn at

Even at that, for worse I'd only shake my head and move on to the next. No need to get angry about anything here.

[dlowwa]

Hi there,
3 I have some concerns about. First, the Bizjet. Too dark? Second, the A320. Automatic contrast failure that I would normally of binned instantly but, it's a hot photo due to the new livery. I'm going to assume straight off the bat that you've just sworn at me quite loudly too! Finally, the 146. Backlit by JP standards?

1. borderline contrast (would be a rejection for me)
2. contrast
3. yes, backlit

[LewisW295]

Hi there,

3 I have some concerns about. First, the Bizjet. Too dark? Second, the A320. Automatic contrast failure that I would normally of binned instantly but, it's a hot photo due to the new livery. I'm going to assume straight off the bat that you've just sworn at me quite loudly too! Finally, the 146. Backlit by JP standards?

[LewisW295]

Ignore. Found a way to show the dust spot. Now to figure out how to transpose that info from the web to my image

[dlowwa]

Even with those highlighted, I can still barely see them worth resharpening the image and correcting on this one?

Is that a question (rhetorical or otherwise)?

[LewisW295]

Some kind of marks in the sky here:

Even with those highlighted, I can still barely see them worth resharpening the image and correcting on this one?

[dlowwa]

Hi all,

Having some issues with this image. Rejected for Dirty/CMOS but I cannot find any trace of dust spots in Lightroom. The only thing I could see that resembled a dust spot in the JP checker got obliterated. Can someone please provide some more information on what I'm missing here? Undersharpened I can handle but invisible dust spots are driving me nuts. Especially as this would be a hot image

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8888315

Some kind of marks in the sky here:

[LewisW295]

Hi all,

Having some issues with this image. Rejected for Dirty/CMOS but I cannot find any trace of dust spots in Lightroom. The only thing I could see that resembled a dust spot in the JP checker got obliterated. Can someone please provide some more information on what I'm missing here? Undersharpened I can handle but invisible dust spots are driving me nuts. Especially as this would be a hot image

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8888315

[LewisW295]

Might be fixable.



Just flat light from the cloudy conditions.



Angle is fine, but very poor light, so probably not fixable.

Ah right, I may just bin the museum shots in favour of another trip!

The 38, my bad. I genuinely thought the lighting was quite good for that one. Guess I'll get there in time.

The A330, fair enough. I think I'm just desperate for some decent shots at the moment. Weather has been crap here recently with complete cloud cover most days. Think I may just be seeing minor weather improvements for more than they are currently.

[dlowwa]

Ah. Might be noise reduction/luminance from LR on 2/3. Worth trying to save in your opinion?

Might be fixable.

With 1, is that perhaps too harsh on the contrast?

Just flat light from the cloudy conditions.

I also have this from a walk this morning. Perhaps soft and poor angle? Taken on an 18mm....

Angle is fine, but very poor light, so probably not fixable.

[PabloGlez]

Ah. Might be noise reduction/luminance from LR on 2/3. Worth trying to save in your opinion? With 1, is that perhaps too harsh on the contrast?

I also have this from a walk this morning. Perhaps soft and poor angle? Taken on an 18mm....

I'm not screener but in my opinion it is not soft and the angle looks also fine. The main problem is the contrast given by the poor light of overcast days, not fixable iŽd say.

Regards!
Pablo Gonzalez de Leon

[LewisW295]

1. borderline contrast
2. horizon (CCW), borderline compression
3. soft, compression

Compression either from your camera or too much NR applied afterwards.

Ah. Might be noise reduction/luminance from LR on 2/3. Worth trying to save in your opinion? With 1, is that perhaps too harsh on the contrast?

I also have this from a walk this morning. Perhaps soft and poor angle? Taken on an 18mm....

[dlowwa]

Evening all

3 I'd like a second look at tonight please!

Not sure if the Tomahawk may be oversaturated or too much contrast. It might even be right but I'm not sure. The two static shots, both contrast and softness (camera issue on the day totaled about 60 shots) and possibly motive/cutoff due to the angle I was working with.

1. borderline contrast
2. horizon (CCW), borderline compression
3. soft, compression

Compression either from your camera or too much NR applied afterwards.

[LewisW295]

Evening all

3 I'd like a second look at tonight please!

Not sure if the Tomahawk may be oversaturated or too much contrast. It might even be right but I'm not sure. The two static shots, both contrast and softness (camera issue on the day totaled about 60 shots) and possibly motive/cutoff due to the angle I was working with.