Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Advice for LewisW295 Please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    It wouldn't be. It would be completely unedited and just for feedback on whether my purple fringing is normal or excessive.

    Still appropriate to poet that image here?
    Yes, as I said, that's fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    If you're not asking for prescreening, that's fine.
    It wouldn't be. It would be completely unedited and just for feedback on whether my purple fringing is normal or excessive.

    Still appropriate to poet that image here?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    It wouldn't be for pre-screening, it would be just to show you the purple fringing as mentioned above. Or would that be better posted in another thread? One of the first things I do in my workflow is eliminate images with excessive fringing but I still keep the unedited file on my HD.
    If you're not asking for prescreening, that's fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    if you want us to pre-screen a photo, please post the photo you intend to upload. A RAW photo will not be pre-screened.
    It wouldn't be for pre-screening, it would be just to show you the purple fringing as mentioned above. Or would that be better posted in another thread? One of the first things I do in my workflow is eliminate images with excessive fringing but I still keep the unedited file on my HD.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    Admittedly, it's less since I've taken the time to try and properly set up Av mode for aviation and moved to RAW files. Would a completely unedited raw file be allowed to be posted here to give an example? Usually happens in brighter coloured aircraft (clean whites or reflective surfaces).
    if you want us to pre-screen a photo, please post the photo you intend to upload. A RAW photo will not be pre-screened.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    It would be easier to answer that, if we could see an example.
    Admittedly, it's less since I've taken the time to try and properly set up Av mode for aviation and moved to RAW files. Would a completely unedited raw file be allowed to be posted here to give an example? Usually happens in brighter coloured aircraft (clean whites or reflective surfaces).

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    I'll have to take a look through the images from that day. There was a much better image but it was obstructed. I've been a tad ruthless in my rejections recently though so I may have to see if there's another workable one.

    Also, a question. Purple fringing.... Avoidable or just to be accepted and fixed in processing? Some of my images have horrible fringing.
    It would be easier to answer that, if we could see an example.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yeah, the problem is you've got more light hitting the building in the background than the aircraft. Not sure how you will be able to adjust for one without over/under compensating for the other. Maybe better to try with one from a little later in the sequence?
    I'll have to take a look through the images from that day. There was a much better image but it was obstructed. I've been a tad ruthless in my rejections recently though so I may have to see if there's another workable one.

    Also, a question. Purple fringing.... Avoidable or just to be accepted and fixed in processing? Some of my images have horrible fringing.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Good Evening/Morning/Ungodly hour

    I had this rejection the other day and I've revisited the overexposure and softness. I'm not sure if this would now be a contrast rejection though?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_36357.jpg
Views:	137
Size:	542.8 KB
ID:	1103709
    Yeah, the problem is you've got more light hitting the building in the background than the aircraft. Not sure how you will be able to adjust for one without over/under compensating for the other. Maybe better to try with one from a little later in the sequence?

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Good Evening/Morning/Ungodly hour

    I had this rejection the other day and I've revisited the overexposure and softness. I'm not sure if this would now be a contrast rejection though?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_36357.jpg
Views:	137
Size:	542.8 KB
ID:	1103709

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Some softness on the first one, but exposure shouldn't be an issue.
    Okiedokie, thank you for that. I shall revisit the DA42 though.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Overexposure/glare is the name of the game for me this week. Are these overexposed/white too bright to your eye? Also, the business jet was taken in a very weird yellow light so would that be a bad color rejection? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1220.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	615.9 KB
ID:	1103645Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1263.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	639.0 KB
ID:	1103646Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1271.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	696.9 KB
ID:	1103647
    Some softness on the first one, but exposure shouldn't be an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Overexposure/glare is the name of the game for me this week. Are these overexposed/white too bright to your eye? Also, the business jet was taken in a very weird yellow light so would that be a bad color rejection? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1220.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	615.9 KB
ID:	1103645Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1263.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	639.0 KB
ID:	1103646Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1271.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	696.9 KB
ID:	1103647

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Processing is fine. Appeal might be worth it.
    Okay, I have done so.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Hi,

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I just had this one rejected for overprocessed/bad post processing. I've checked for my immediate thought of halos but can't find any. I understand it was a borderline contrast rejection but if any insight to the above can be offered then that would be epic.

    Processing is fine. Appeal might be worth it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X