Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Calvin L - Screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Calvin L View Post
    Hi again all, on both of the B777 Garuda, is it ok for accepting? and for the Lion and Batik is the shadows ok? Any other advice is welcomed thank you
    1. soft, color overprocessed
    2-4. soft, overprocessed

    Originally posted by Calvin L View Post
    And also, if we change our name at JP, when will our pictures name changed? Thanks
    Any photos uploaded after the name change will have the new name. Previously uploaded photos will not be changed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Hi again all, on both of the B777 Garuda, is it ok for accepting? and for the Lion and Batik is the shadows ok? Any other advice is welcomed thank you
    And also, if we change our name at JP, when will our pictures name changed? Thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

    With soft I mean undersarpened, and borderline soft is that is in the limit, so the sharpened is not perfect.
    For fix it, just add more sharpen and reduce the noise reduction (It looks like it had).
    Understood Pablo, Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Quite soft, nearly blurry yes. If the original is the same, then yes not fixable.
    Ok dlowwa, then its not fixable since the original is the same. Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by Calvin L View Post

    Thanks for advice Pablo, what do you mean by soft and how to fix it? same as borderline soft?
    With soft I mean undersarpened, and borderline soft is that is in the limit, so the sharpened is not perfect.
    For fix it, just add more sharpen and reduce the noise reduction (It looks like it had).

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Calvin L View Post

    Thanks for advice Pablo, what do you mean by soft and how to fix it? same as borderline soft?

    I need help on this photo of Citilink, is 3:2 ratio okay? and is this picture blurry resulting undersharpened? and unfixable? Thank you
    Quite soft, nearly blurry yes. If the original is the same, then yes not fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

    1) Soft and color
    2) Backlit
    3) Borderline soft and color. Easy to fix using the white balance.
    Thanks for advice Pablo, what do you mean by soft and how to fix it? same as borderline soft?

    I need help on this photo of Citilink, is 3:2 ratio okay? and is this picture blurry resulting undersharpened? and unfixable? Thank you
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by Calvin L View Post
    Hi everyone, these are photos taken from the terminal, and these were the best so far, Im worried with the quality issues because the terminal glass was a normal blue color. I need focus help on the GMV because it has active obstacle. Thank you for any advice on these pictures
    1) Soft and color
    2) Backlit
    3) Borderline soft and color. Easy to fix using the white balance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Hi everyone, these are photos taken from the terminal, and these were the best so far, Im worried with the quality issues because the terminal glass was a normal blue color. I need focus help on the GMV because it has active obstacle. Thank you for any advice on these pictures
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

    I´m not screener but I checked it using the JP check for dust tool and there are not any dust spots now.
    Thanks for your help Pablo

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by Calvin L View Post
    Hi everyone, this picture was rejected with CMOS Dust spots, and yes I found about 6dust in the picture, I wonder if there are more visible in your side before upload it back to the queue. Thank you
    I´m not screener but I checked it using the JP check for dust tool and there are not any dust spots now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Hi everyone, this picture was rejected with CMOS Dust spots, and yes I found about 6dust in the picture, I wonder if there are more visible in your side before upload it back to the queue. Thank you
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Hi, please read here carefully when you get the chance, especially #3, and my follow-on post



    3. Please limit your prescreening requests to a maximum of 5 images per 24 hours (not calendar day)

    Prescreening is meant to be used as a tool to check certain images you are unsure about, learn from the feedback you receive, improve, then hopefully not need to ask for help in those areas any more. It is not meant to be a process where you post the maximum number of requests you can, wait the minimum 24 hours, then post the maximum again, and repeat. I see more than a few guys doing this, and it shows me that they are not really making any effort to learn from the process but rather are simply taking advantage of free screening. If you've taken 10+ images in similar conditions, there is no need to post all of them for feedback. One or two will do, and you can then apply that feedback to the rest.
    Hi again dlowwa, yes I have read all that slowly, sorry in advance for that dlowwa, most of my picture would normally result in halos but mostly overprocessed, so I should only fix it by light tones? I always auto tone every picture tho Thank You

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Calvin L View Post

    Ok dlowwa, Ive fixed the PK-AZM and more pictures to be fixed maybe? Thank you
    Hi, please read here carefully when you get the chance, especially #3, and my follow-on post



    3. Please limit your prescreening requests to a maximum of 5 images per 24 hours (not calendar day)

    Prescreening is meant to be used as a tool to check certain images you are unsure about, learn from the feedback you receive, improve, then hopefully not need to ask for help in those areas any more. It is not meant to be a process where you post the maximum number of requests you can, wait the minimum 24 hours, then post the maximum again, and repeat. I see more than a few guys doing this, and it shows me that they are not really making any effort to learn from the process but rather are simply taking advantage of free screening. If you've taken 10+ images in similar conditions, there is no need to post all of them for feedback. One or two will do, and you can then apply that feedback to the rest.

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Contrast in that case was referring to the poor light from the cloudy weather. It's not such an easy thing to fix with editing

    1. overprocessed, borderline heat haze
    2. borderline soft
    3. overprocessed
    4. ok for me
    5. borderline dark/contrast
    Ok dlowwa, Ive fixed the PK-AZM and more pictures to be fixed maybe? Thank you
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X