Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

screening help for ronen_fefer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Question: is the contrast in this photo still low?
    And is the photo acceptable?
    Yes, still a bit low. Also borderline soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Question: is the contrast in this photo still low?
    And is the photo acceptable?



    Thanks in advance.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC8854.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	369.7 KB
ID:	1131350

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Hi Could someone prescreen this photo?
    Would be rejected for too far, vignetting, dust spots, and possibly contrast.

    Originally posted by LuftSpotter View Post
    I am not a screener. As far as i know, the sun is higher than the aircraft. From this angle, there's no sunlight ON the aircraft.
    That is incorrect. The sun is on this side of the aircraft, so it is not backlit.

    Leave a comment:


  • LuftSpotter
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC9966(jetphotos).jpg
Views:	55
Size:	343.5 KB
ID:	1130911 Hi Could someone prescreen this photo?

    thanks in advance!
    I am not a screener. As far as i know, the sun is higher than the aircraft. From this angle, there's no sunlight ON the aircraft. This photo's chance doesn't look good.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC9966(jetphotos).jpg
Views:	55
Size:	343.5 KB
ID:	1130911 Hi Could someone prescreen this photo?

    thanks in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Will this work?
    I think its quite high right here to be honest.
    Still well below the centerline, but your call. I won't comment on this any more.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_45352.jpeg
Views:	86
Size:	576.0 KB
ID:	1130590

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post


    Still too low. Crop a bit tighter and put it higher:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC8854.jpg Views:	0 Size:	542.6 KB ID:	1130557 Will this work?
    I think its quite high right here to be honest.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Ok so I tried to fix the issues that you have brought up, and these are the results:

    Still too low. Crop a bit tighter and put it higher:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_45349.jpeg
Views:	96
Size:	206.8 KB
ID:	1130554

    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Now I'm not sure which one is more acceptable in terms of compression the first one (quality=100) or the second one (quality = 60)?
    First, not even close. Never use anything less than 100 quality.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Crop is ok, but too low in the frame, and borderline quality (softness, contrast, compression) for 1920pix.
    Ok so I tried to fix the issues that you have brought up, and these are the results:

    Now I'm not sure which one is more acceptable in terms of compression the first one (quality=100) or the second one (quality = 60)?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC8854.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	529.1 KB
ID:	1130551Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC88541.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	256.7 KB
ID:	1130552

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    Will this work?
    Crop is ok, but too low in the frame, and borderline quality (softness, contrast, compression) for 1920pix.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC88541.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	550.6 KB
ID:	1130538 Will this work?

    thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post

    you mean its uncentered basically?
    And needs a tighter crop, yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    This would be rejected for too far/centering. Processing is not an issue.
    you mean its uncentered basically?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post

    fixed, though the only problem I could find is HALOS around the wing but I'm not sure if they are enough to reject my photo, could someone help me here?
    i have added the equalized version for reference.
    This would be rejected for too far/centering. Processing is not an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • ronen_fefer
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Images larger than 1920pix cannot be submitted to the queue.
    fixed, though the only problem I could find is HALOS around the wing but I'm not sure if they are enough to reject my photo, could someone help me here?
    i have added the equalized version for reference.

    Thanks in advance Ronen. Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC88541.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	517.0 KB
ID:	1130407Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC8854.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	844.3 KB
ID:	1130408

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X