Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Would these three be already acceptable?
    Is the exposure alright?
    Is it well framed and centred?
    Would the 3 be considered as bad motive?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    ok, thanks, Ill try to fix it.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

    How exactly do you mean over rotated?
    Do you mean it as the rejected image was ok, or that I have overcorrected it?
    Overcorrected.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. new edit a little bit over-rotated and darker
    2. ok for me
    How exactly do you mean over rotated?
    Do you mean it as the rejected image was ok, or that I have overcorrected it?

    2 is already accpted, thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Hello, I have received this rejection, for horizon.

    I have tried a different edit.
    Is it already acceptable, or are there other issues?
    Is the original photo really too badly unleveled, or is it worth appealing?

    Also this one got rejected for centering.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Does it meant it is too low?
    Are there any other issues aside of the centering?
    Would the 2 be already be acceptable?
    1. new edit a little bit over-rotated and darker
    2. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Hello, I have received this rejection, for horizon.

    I have tried a different edit.
    Is it already acceptable, or are there other issues?
    Is the original photo really too badly unleveled, or is it worth appealing?

    Also this one got rejected for centering.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Does it meant it is too low?
    Are there any other issues aside of the centering?
    Would the 2 be already be acceptable?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    I have tried to sharpen it a bit more.
    Also rotated it slightly and applied some lens corrections.
    Is it better now?
    Would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    I have tried to sharpen it a bit more.
    Also rotated it slightly and applied some lens corrections.
    Is it better now?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Thanks for your help.
    Would this KC-135 by acceptable, or does it need some corrections?
    Maybe a bit soft in spots, but would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Thanks for your help.
    Would this KC-135 by acceptable, or does it need some corrections?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    And now?
    Hope could finally be ok.
    Not sure whether the contrast could be extended any further, histogram was already stating to show some clipping from both sides.
    I have also improved the centring, would that be ok either?
    Still borderline contrast; tail area a bit softer in this one.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    And now?
    Hope could finally be ok.
    Not sure whether the contrast could be extended any further, histogram was already stating to show some clipping from both sides.
    I have also improved the centring, would that be ok either?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

    I have moved a few sliders, is it ok now?
    Better; still borderline.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Likely a rejection for (low) contrast.
    I have moved a few sliders, is it ok now?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    OK, sorry.
    Removed 1, can the remaining L39 be accepted?
    Likely a rejection for (low) contrast.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X