Originally posted by Michael Wolf
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Hi all
Why the photo was rejected, in the background of three aircraft together?
I wanted to upload the photo first plane of lufthansa will be down on the left side with a space to see the second plane of Air Berlin and Asiann.
Or, need upload as AIRPORT OVERVIEW in JP?
I need rotate CW or CWW?
I'll re-rdit photos, some need to rotate? which direction?
I used a 18-105 lens it was perhaps because of unlevel photo?
which problem in the photo?
Are you agree that the photo is herizon unlevel?
Actually I think the pohto is straight, I work with a ruler tool to straighten a pohto in photoshop CS5.
Best regards,
Siegi.
Comment
-
Good day!
I have question: what's wrong with registration of that Magister?
There is no way to find the c/n for that aircraft, it would be the first pic of this plane in JP.net base, even on "other" (A.net) site this plane is showed as 5-MF without c/n ;( Moreover, there is no info about reg and c/n on oficial site of Aviation Museum in Cracow.
It would be better to talk about this rejection here rather than wasting one appeal chance.
Greetings!
Comment
-
Originally posted by MoBL View PostGood day!
I have question: what's wrong with registration of that Magister?
There is no way to find the c/n for that aircraft, it would be the first pic of this plane in JP.net base, even on "other" (A.net) site this plane is showed as 5-MF without c/n ;( Moreover, there is no info about reg and c/n on oficial site of Aviation Museum in Cracow.
It would be better to talk about this rejection here rather than wasting one appeal chance.
Greetings!
Originally posted by James Bruno View PostHey all quick question.
I recently had alot of photos rejected due to the length and width of my pictures. What are the appropriate dimensions for a photo of 1600 pixels?
As mentioned in the upload guidelines images are required to be within the aspect ratios of 3:2 and 4:3, so for an image 1600 pixels wide the smallest permissible height would be 1067 pixels and the largest would be 1200. Most image editing software has the ability to select a preset aspect ratio or create custom ones, which makes it a lot easier because you don't need to worry about whether the dimensions are right, simply crop and resize.
Comment
-
Hello guys and lady
I got these two images rejected for unsharpen and too much or too litte contrast.
1. http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3247981
2. http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3247980
Is it worth appealing for these images ? On my screen i don't see any unsharpen en contrast looks fine in mine opinion. So i think both arguments are open for discussion.
Cheers Bjorn
Comment
-
Originally posted by MoBL View PostGood day!
I have question: what's wrong with registration of that Magister?
There is no way to find the c/n for that aircraft, it would be the first pic of this plane in JP.net base, even on "other" (A.net) site this plane is showed as 5-MF without c/n ;( Moreover, there is no info about reg and c/n on oficial site of Aviation Museum in Cracow.
It would be better to talk about this rejection here rather than wasting one appeal chance.
Greetings!
And also leave a remark to screener about the non existant reg.
Regards
Alex
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bjorn1979 View PostHello guys and lady
I got these two images rejected for unsharpen and too much or too litte contrast.
1. http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3247981
2. http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3247980
Is it worth appealing for these images ? On my screen i don't see any unsharpen en contrast looks fine in mine opinion. So i think both arguments are open for discussion.
Cheers Bjorn
Regards
Alex
Comment
-
Originally posted by MoBL View PostGood day!
I have question: what's wrong with registration of that Magister?
There is no way to find the c/n for that aircraft, it would be the first pic of this plane in JP.net base, even on "other" (A.net) site this plane is showed as 5-MF without c/n ;( Moreover, there is no info about reg and c/n on oficial site of Aviation Museum in Cracow.
It would be better to talk about this rejection here rather than wasting one appeal chance.
Greetings!
Rgds,
Comment
-
Originally posted by C-FITL View PostHello, I have had these rejected and am wondering if they could be fixed and how? Thanks
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3248991
2) SLight green/bue cast, can be fixed easily.
3)As above but needs some more sharpening
4)If you have edited the brightness in, it may be spareable.
Comment
Comment