If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!
Hi Roel,
..........But, In the rejected photo, the airplane is during the climbing after takeoff with the wheels up, and the angle of the nose is towards up.
So... I'm really sorry, but I can not understand the problem.
All the best,
Erez.
PS: as always I'm apologize if I have any mistakes with my bad English...
The main issue Erez is that the landing gear being down makes very little difference to the overall image. If the shots had been at a different angle of view then they would both be accepted.
.......and your English is much better than my Hebrew !!!!
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
The main issue Erez is that the landing gear being down makes very little difference to the overall image. If the shots had been at a different angle of view then they would both be accepted.
.......and your English is much better than my Hebrew !!!!
I got the whole batch rejected as undersharpened/soft, and I'm trying to figure out if they really are soft or if the screener's contacts were getting dry. I know I processed all those together and they were screened together, so it has to be something systematic (9 photos rejected). But for now those 3 will suffice, at least they can give me an idea of what was wrong.
And can anyone check what the issues were with the categories with both the Jetstar and the C-130? Because I have no way of checking the categories, and my upload records are not that meticulous.
They are definatly not soft.
As for categories, did you tick Warbird/vintage and biz jet for the Jetstar
Warbird and cargo for the C130?
I can't check either, but I dare say that is maybe why. I would appeal the DC-4
Ah. I must have forgotten the wardbird category, I know I didn't forget with the C-54 because that's an older plane. I'm pretty sure I selected cargo for the C-130 and bizjet for the VC-140, but I don't recall selecting warbird.
Just to refresh my memory, if the plane is military and in a museum is it automatically a warbird?
I will probably go through the batch later today and check, possibly appeal the C-54 (and if theres more that didn't have the category problem and look good)
The primary reason for the rejection of two of your shots was the categories. Secondary was the undersharpened issue. Take this as a suggestion to re-sharpen them before you re-upload.
The C-54 is undersharpened, particularly noticeable across the top of the fuselage. Keep in mind you have 8 recent rejections for soft from a multitude of screeners. This is an indication that you may need to review your editing of these shots.
Should a place it higher in frame and cut off a part of the tail ?
Best regards,
Bjorn
Bjorn,
Apart from being a tad low in the frame, screeners also weren't fond of the particular crop. Too much of the wing is sticking out on the left, while it's very tightly cut on the right.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment