New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

[pauwelsc]

Hey JP-team

Could you pre-screen these ones?

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Thanks!

[Degupukas]

hello jp team please prescreen


thanks a lots

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello again JP Team.
Can i also get your opinion on these 3 photos. Thanks

[StefBrat]

Could you please check these 2 as I'm not sure and don't want to raise the queue. Weather wasn't that good but also not that bad.

Thanks

[Segi]

Hello,
Is this one OK despite all the details around? If fine, can I use VP-BZA as registration (as to me the B737 is the main topic) or should I use "ramp" category?

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0jAlrCzVTmPV3Zjb2FsT0dVcjg

Thank you

[Segi]

Hello,
This one https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6117375 is giving me a hard time as I had it rejected 2 times for the same reasons:
Dark / Underexposed
Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)
Too much or too little contrast
I was told by a fellow photographer (not a screener) that the histogram is not covering all the range.
Still the "Bad Color" issue was not clear.
I have edited the white and black and increased the exposure.
Here is the result that I would like to resubmit: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0...DI5dUtQUkE1VHc
Would it finally be acceptable or can a screener please kindly tell me what is the obvious reason that I missed again?
(Of course watermark will be removed)
Thank you!

[dlowwa]

Hello!
Are these ok for upload? Many thanks

1. soft, dark, contrast
2 & 3 both have a some vignetting on the right side, especially #3.

dlowwa, many thanks for your feedback as always! Just a question to understand more the terms and expressions. When you say ""overprocessed' (#2) what this means in the picture? The aircraft is overprocessed in which way?

Visible editing halos.

Here is the original image. Do you think this point can ben corrected? With this details I can improve my workflow!

Halos are visible in this too. The only way to remove them will be to re-process the image from the raw file. If you do not have a raw file and only jpeg, you will not be able to remove them. To avoid this in the future, I suggest turning off the 'D-lighting' feature in your D3200, as that is the likely cause.

About the others, find attached new versions.

2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9431[/ATTACH]

New: 3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9433[/ATTACH]
New: 4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9434[/ATTACH]

Thanks!

2. centering (too low)
3. ok
4. borderline soft

[dlowwa]

Thanks dlowwa. Noise can be fixed, but any suggestions for the exposure/contrast? If this is the wrong place to ask, sorry...

Increase the exposure a bit. The contrast you can't do very much about due to the overcast light.

[dlowwa]

Hi, can anyone give some advice on this photo? thank you.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9438[/ATTACH]

It's backlit. We generally prefer if you shoot the side of the aircraft that is in the light, not shadow.

Hey JP-team

Could you pre-screen these ones?

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9447[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9448[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9449[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9450[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9451[/ATTACH]

Thanks!

1. compression in sky
2. ok
3. compression in sky, editing halos
4. ok
5. borderline color

They actually all have some compression in the sky, but it's most noticeable on 1 & 3.

[dlowwa]

hello jp team please prescreen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9452[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9453[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9454[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9455[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9456[/ATTACH]

thanks a lots

1. contrast, overprocessed
2. ok
3. overprocessed/compression - the background looks heavily compressed from noise reduction or something
4. soft, blurry
5. borderline color

Could you please check these 2 as I'm not sure and don't want to raise the queue. Weather wasn't that good but also not that bad.

Thanks

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9460[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9461[/ATTACH]

1. borderline contrast, and check horizon
2. ok

[dlowwa]

Hello,
Is this one OK despite all the details around? If fine, can I use VP-BZA as registration (as to me the B737 is the main topic) or should I use "ramp" category?
Thank you

Use VP-BZA please. Aircraft is not obstructed, so ok for submission.

Hello,
This one https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6117375 is giving me a hard time as I had it rejected 2 times for the same reasons:
Dark / Underexposed
Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)
Too much or too little contrast
I was told by a fellow photographer (not a screener) that the histogram is not covering all the range.
Still the "Bad Color" issue was not clear.
I have edited the white and black and increased the exposure.
Here is the result that I would like to resubmit: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0...DI5dUtQUkE1VHc
Would it finally be acceptable or can a screener please kindly tell me what is the obvious reason that I missed again?
(Of course watermark will be removed)
Thank you!

Other than brightness, I don't see much difference. There is a light violet/blue cast to both images, probably just needs a slight WB adjustment.

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello again JP Team.
Can i also get your opinion on these 3 photos. Thanks

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9457[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9458[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9459[/ATTACH]

Hello Dlowwa, when possible can you give me your opinion on these. Thanks again and have a nice weekend

[pauwelsc]

Hey JP-team

Could you pre-screen these ones?

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Number 1 is maybe oversharpened and color, number 2 soft not sure about number 4 either (color/ contrast).

Thanks a lot for this opportunity to do the pre-screening, it's really useful for me. The pictures you pre-screen are most of the time accepted and I really learn a lot from your corrections. Again thanks!

[Julian S.]

Hey, good evening!

What do you think? Acceptable or backlit yet?


Thanks a lot, have a nice weekend

[KyleMcKinlay]

Thanks for the previous comments on the Apache, have raised exposure and reduced noise - how do you think it is now? Also, if anyone has any time to check the other four I'd be very grateful. Thank you!