Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • leocb24
    replied
    Look this photos

    Hello team!, take a look for this photos please! 1. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2284-1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	643.6 KB
ID:	1017570 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	20170921_155659-1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	816.8 KB
ID:	1017569 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2344-1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	641.1 KB
ID:	1017571 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0126-1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	764.5 KB
ID:	1017572 5.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0210-1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	595.8 KB
ID:	1017573


    Thanks for your help!

    Leave a comment:


  • pauwelsc
    replied
    Hi! Looking forward to know your opinion on these ones...

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FEAK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	947.5 KB
ID:	1017564 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-TTG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	696.2 KB
ID:	1017565 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-FHL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	544.5 KB
ID:	1017566 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-DBCD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	780.7 KB
ID:	1017567 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-ZBAV kopie.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	854.3 KB
ID:	1017568

    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Degupukas
    replied
    hi jp team please prescreen
    Click image for larger version

Name:	msp006-3blurry.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	550.5 KB
ID:	1017558 Click image for larger version

Name:	n859au.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	535.6 KB
ID:	1017559 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-aop.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	657.2 KB
ID:	1017560 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-ast.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	899.2 KB
ID:	1017561 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bab-1color.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	564.1 KB
ID:	1017562

    thanks a lot

    Leave a comment:


  • crisquijano
    replied
    Hi JP team, please check these. thank you.
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	MSP_MSP003_23SEP17_16--_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1017556

    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	Interjet_XA-VAI_13SEP17_1600_toff.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	897.6 KB
ID:	1017557

    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	AVIANCA_N689TA_23MAR17_1200_34sbehind.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	713.9 KB
ID:	1017563
    Also, is #3 considered similar to https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8614627 ?

    thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paixão Silva
    replied
    1. oversharpening/compression artifacts visible
    2. dark, soft[/QUOTE]


    Hello dlowwa, is this one better? Thanks!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CSTRDps22x1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	834.5 KB
ID:	1017554

    Leave a comment:


  • vcruvinel
    replied
    Hey guys!

    I uploaded this shot [https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6115507] some days ago, but after doing a quickly search, I found the same helicopter in civilian and military category. The photo is in the queue and I can change some informations. Which category I have to select? Military or Civilian? I had a problem with this kind of information in another shot last week, so I need to understand how to check this field. Unfortunately the specific link to the military guide [https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php/?p=431408] is off (I got this link in the JP guidelines). So if there is another link or source of information I will appreciate!

    Many thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
    Hey JP-team

    Could you please take a look at this?

    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9605[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9606[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9607[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9608[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9609[/ATTACH]

    So these were all pictures I uploaded here before but which got rejected previously. I tried to update them.
    More to come tonight!
    Thanks a lot!
    1. right side still soft/blurry
    2. ok
    3. overprocessed
    4. ok
    5. ok

    Originally posted by pawelm View Post
    Hi guys,

    Can I get an opinion on those?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9613[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9614[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9615[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9616[/ATTACH]

    The last one as a spotting location ofcourse

    thanks!
    Borderline contrast on all of them. Looks like the light wasn't very good that day.

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
    Hello dlowwa, what do you think of these two? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9622[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9623[/ATTACH]
    1. oversharpening/compression artifacts visible
    2. dark, soft

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Sergio Canobbio View Post
    Hello. It is possible to have an evaluation?

    1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]9593[/ATTACH]

    2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]9594[/ATTACH]

    I already asked advice for n.1, and tried to fix it with the suggestions received.
    1. soft
    2. very soft, overexposed

    Originally posted by Degupukas View Post
    hello jp team please pre-screen
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9595[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9597[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9598[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9599[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9611[/ATTACH]
    thanks
    1. overprocesed
    2. overexposed
    3. borderline contrast/overprocessed
    4. ok
    5. borderline contrast

    Be careful with whatever filter you're using (shadow/highlight, clarity, etc..) it's causing the contrast to be washed out and leaving visible halos in some instances.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by crisquijano View Post
    Hi again JP team, please check this set.

    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9585[/ATTACH]
    2.Second version, improved color[ATTACH=CONFIG]9586[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9610[/ATTACH] Would this be Ramp or Terminal?

    4. Also, I just got this one rejected as Overexposed. It was pre-screened and OKed here.
    Original version
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Please pre-screen this new version in which I eliminated more highlights.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9612[/ATTACH]
    1. color, contrast
    2. color
    3. (ramp) soft, vignetting
    4. histogram says a bit overexposed on the original, but both look fine to me

    Originally posted by Ivan Jimenez Rojas View Post
    Hi JP Team... please evaluate these shots. Thank you!
    1[ATTACH=CONFIG]9587[/ATTACH] 2[ATTACH=CONFIG]9588[/ATTACH] 3[ATTACH=CONFIG]9589[/ATTACH] 4[ATTACH=CONFIG]9590[/ATTACH] 5[ATTACH=CONFIG]9591[/ATTACH]
    1. soft
    2. soft, dark/contrast
    3. check horizon
    4. soft, contrast, color
    5. very soft, contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paixão Silva
    replied
    Hello dlowwa, what do you think of these two? Thanks!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CSTRDps1x1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	837.5 KB
ID:	1017552
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4631ps2x1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1017553

    Leave a comment:


  • pauwelsc
    replied
    Last pre-screen post for today. Again thank you for investing your time in this!

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	HA-LKJ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	870.3 KB
ID:	1017547 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIUG.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	580.4 KB
ID:	1017548 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZMH.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	799.0 KB
ID:	1017549 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	ET-ATH.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1017550 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-DVH.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	942.8 KB
ID:	1017551

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Hi guys,

    Can I get an opinion on those?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N846AX_03.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	959.5 KB
ID:	1017543 Click image for larger version

Name:	LZ-FBE_02.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	953.9 KB
ID:	1017544 Click image for larger version

Name:	N649GT_02.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	879.5 KB
ID:	1017545 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0710.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.42 MB
ID:	1017546

    The last one as a spotting location ofcourse

    thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • pauwelsc
    replied
    Hey JP-team

    Could you please take a look at this?

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-FXN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	900.8 KB
ID:	1017535 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIQB.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	955.9 KB
ID:	1017536 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-ZBAO.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	700.9 KB
ID:	1017537 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	OH-LZD.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	750.6 KB
ID:	1017538 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-LCYT.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1017539

    So these were all pictures I uploaded here before but which got rejected previously. I tried to update them.
    More to come tonight!
    Thanks a lot!

    Leave a comment:


  • Degupukas
    replied
    hello jp team please pre-screen
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bhm-al.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	442.7 KB
ID:	1017526 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bdw.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	773.1 KB
ID:	1017527 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bhl.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	916.9 KB
ID:	1017528 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bcx.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	806.4 KB
ID:	1017529 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bgl.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	673.5 KB
ID:	1017541
    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Sergio Canobbio
    replied
    Hello. It is possible to have an evaluation?

    1 Click image for larger version

Name:	67943_1506114237.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	648.3 KB
ID:	1017524

    2 Click image for larger version

Name:	88626_1506114540.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	785.8 KB
ID:	1017525

    I already asked advice for n.1, and tried to fix it with the suggestions received.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X