New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

[dlowwa]

Hi,
if some screener could pre-screen these photos, it would be nice!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9537[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9538[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9539[/ATTACH]

thanks!

1. dark, contrast, overprocessed
2. borderline contrast
3. borderline contrast & oversharpen

need prescreen in this shots. thanks!

Borderline CW on the first. Second ok.

[dlowwa]

Hello dlowwa, about these two previous photos i increased sharpness in both (2 levels of sharpness for each photo). Any acceptable? Thanks!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9528[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9529[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9530[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9531[/ATTACH]

The second versions are indeed sharper.

hi Jp team please prescreen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9532[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9533[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9534[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9535[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9536[/ATTACH]
thanks

1. color
2. dark, contrast, soft
3. color, soft, horizon
4. contrast
5. color, too far/centering

[dlowwa]

Your thoughts about this one. Got doubts about this one for sharpening and centering.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9523[/ATTACH]

Indeed a bit soft and low in the frame.

Hi, please pre-screen these ones. thank you.

1[ATTACH=CONFIG]9524[/ATTACH]
2.Second version, less exposure.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9525[/ATTACH]
3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9526[/ATTACH]
4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9527[/ATTACH]
5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9540[/ATTACH]

1. color
2. color, contrast, overexposure
3. backlit, contrast
4. color
5. color, contrast

[Ivan Jimenez Rojas]

Hi JP Team... please evaluate these shots. Thank you!
1 2 3 4 5

[vcruvinel]

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9435[/ATTACH] - Corrected CCW Rotation
2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9436[/ATTACH] - Corrected CW Rotation

need prescreen in this shots. thanks!

[gabrielmagacho]

Hi,
if some screener could pre-screen these photos, it would be nice!


thanks!

[Degupukas]

hi Jp team please prescreen

thanks

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

I see softness remaining an issue for both.

Hello dlowwa, about these two previous photos i increased sharpness in both (2 levels of sharpness for each photo). Any acceptable? Thanks!

[crisquijano]

Hi, please pre-screen these ones. thank you.

1
2.Second version, less exposure.

3.
4.
5.

[wkd001]

Your thoughts about this one. Got doubts about this one for sharpening and centering.

[dlowwa]

Hi! I have edited the TUI 787 a little by adjusting the white balance and increasing exposure. For the others, well, who knows...! Thank you very much again

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9507[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9508[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9509[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9510[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9511[/ATTACH]

1. borderline oversharpened
2. dark/contrast
3. ok
4. borderline contrast
5. ok

Hello dlowwa, about the first one is it better? If its really heat haze i will keep it to my personal collection.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9515[/ATTACH]

Quality looks ok, though might need a little CCW rotation.

Just out of curiosity, what do you think of this one:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9516[/ATTACH]

A bit dark.

Since it is a new registration I'm loosing my slots quickly and would like to get an opinion if the light violet/blue cast is no longer visible https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0...VdNd1VRMkplWU0
Here is the rejected one https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6117375

Color is slightly better, but otherwise not much difference between the two.

[dlowwa]

Hey JP-team

I updated some of the previous pictures you pre-screened and added some new ones.

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9494[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9495[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9496[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9497[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9498[/ATTACH]

Number 1, 2, 3 and 5 were all rejected before as being soft. I tried to sharpen it a bit more.

Thanks again!

1. oversharpen, noise, contrast
2. soft
3. oversharpen, horizon, contrast
4. borderline soft
5. ok

hello JP team please prescreen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9499[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9500[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9501[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9522[/ATTACH]
thanks

1. borderline contrast
2. borderline soft
3. ok
4. heat haze

[dlowwa]

Weather Conditions were not the best this day, so i wonder if these are still ok for upload.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9489[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9490[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9491[/ATTACH]

All a bit soft. Contrast should be ok.

Hi JP Team... please evaluate these shots. Thank you!

1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9493[/ATTACH]
2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9517[/ATTACH]
3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9519[/ATTACH] Would this be considered "Similar" to https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8674756?
4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9520[/ATTACH]
5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9521[/ATTACH]

1. color, soft
2. borderline contrast
3. color, overexposure. Similar if the from the same date.
4/5. soft, similar

[Segi]

Other than brightness, I don't see much difference. There is a light violet/blue cast to both images, probably just needs a slight WB adjustment.

Since it is a new registration I'm loosing my slots quickly and would like to get an opinion if the light violet/blue cast is no longer visible https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0...VdNd1VRMkplWU0
Here is the rejected one https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6117375

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

[QUOTE=dlowwa;653574]First has some heat haze or compression affecting it. Other two should be ok.

Hello dlowwa, about the first one is it better? If its really heat haze i will keep it to my personal collection.



Just out of curiosity, what do you think of this one: