vcruvinel - Editing advice

[vcruvinel]

Whole aircraft is soft, really, but especially towards nose & tail.

Dana, thanks you very much for you attention and answer. I willl correct this issue.

Thanks,

Vinicius

[vcruvinel]

Hi,

Can I have some opinions in this shots?

#1.
#2.

Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Can I have some opinions in this shots?

#1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18387[/ATTACH]
#2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18388[/ATTACH]

Thanks!

1. horizon, borderline oversharpened
2. ok

[vcruvinel]

1. horizon, borderline oversharpened
2. ok

Thanks for the feedback, Dana.

Another question...About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6774292 - it's really dark/underexposed? Need to know to understand more, as it not appear dark in my monitor.

Cheers!

Vinicius

[wkd001]

Thanks for the feedback, Dana.

Another question...About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6774292 - it's really dark/underexposed? Need to know to understand more, as it not appear dark in my monitor.

Cheers!

Vinicius

Vinicius,

IMHO, yes.
Or with adding white tones, or exposure, or toying with the curves.
Power of the evening isn't coming out to me with this edit.

Hope this helps,

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thanks for the feedback, Dana.

Another question...About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6774292 - it's really dark/underexposed? Need to know to understand more, as it not appear dark in my monitor.

Cheers!

Vinicius

It is a bit dark, but not quite enough for a rejection for me.

[vcruvinel]

Dana and Wilko, many thanks for the reply and support!

A nice day for both.

Vinicius

[vcruvinel]

Hi!

Need some comments about this shot, the main question is about the horizon/vertical levels. Looks good? Also the quality looks ok?

#1.
#2.

Cheers,

Vinicius

[olandes269]

Hi!

Need some comments about this shot, the main question is about the horizon/vertical levels. Looks good? Also the quality looks ok?

#1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18499[/ATTACH]
#2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18500[/ATTACH]

Cheers,

Vinicius

Hi Vinicius,

For #1, horizon, the left pole leans.

for 2, ok for me

Regards

olivier

[vcruvinel]

Hi Vinicius,

For #1, horizon, the left pole leans.

for 2, ok for me

Regards

olivier

Thanks, Olivier!

[vcruvinel]

Hi for all,

Can I have some opinions about this shot please? Main about the level and contrast, but others points will be really appreciated as well.



Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hi for all,

Can I have some opinions about this shot please? Main about the level and contrast, but others points will be really appreciated as well.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]18657[/ATTACH]

Thanks!

Horizon is ok; contrast will be borderline due to the overcast light.

[vcruvinel]

Horizon is ok; contrast will be borderline due to the overcast light.

Thanks for your reply.

I have some doubts about this shot I took last year:

The angle is not the best and interesting one, but the main thing is in this day I forgot to put off the d-lighting from my camera, so sometimes in the photos from this day appears some halos around the aircraft. In this one I did not change any shadows/highlight/clarity parameters but I saw some light white halos in the top of the fuselage. It`s ok or can be considered overprocessing?

Thanks!

Vinicius

[dlowwa]

Thanks for your reply.

I have some doubts about this shot I took last year: [ATTACH=CONFIG]18773[/ATTACH]

The angle is not the best and interesting one, but the main thing is in this day I forgot to put off the d-lighting from my camera, so sometimes in the photos from this day appears some halos around the aircraft. In this one I did not change any shadows/highlight/clarity parameters but I saw some light white halos in the top of the fuselage. It`s ok or can be considered overprocessing?

Thanks!

Vinicius

I don't see (over)processing being an issue on this one.

[vcruvinel]

I don't see (over)processing being an issue on this one.

Thanks for you feedback. There is any major issue with this shot as it don't have over processing problems?

Cheers,

Vinicius