pauwelsc - Editing advice

[dlowwa]

Hey team! This one got rejected recently. I understand the ratio (was 675px, now adapted to 706px) but I don't understand the compression artefacts. I don't 'see' that problem on the picture. Could you help me?

Link: rejected picture: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6320378

'New' edit of the picture; acceptable or not?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13247[/ATTACH]

Thanks a lot!

Looks soft, and maybe a little compression visible in the sky, but the latter doesn't seem as big an issue as the former.

[pauwelsc]

Hey team! Just took this picture, I absolutely love it but before I want to share it with others, I want to know what you think about it.

Thanks a lot!!

[LX-A343]

Hey team! Just took this picture, I absolutely love it but before I want to share it with others, I want to know what you think about it.

Thanks a lot!!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13464[/ATTACH]

the photo is soft and slightly noisy, leaning a bit to the right and it looks as if it suffers from window glare.

[pauwelsc]

Hey team! What do you think of this wing view picture?



Further, I just got these two pictures rejected: how to fix it?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6368824

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6369141 (which special category? Special scheme? It's the new livery so it's a 'normal' scheme, no?)

Thanks a lot!

[dlowwa]

Hey team! What do you think of this wing view picture?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13697[/ATTACH]

Soft and low contrast.

Further, I just got these two pictures rejected: how to fix it?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6368824

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6369141 (which special category? Special scheme? It's the new livery so it's a 'normal' scheme, no?)

Reduce the exposure on both. Second one requires no special categories.

[pauwelsc]

Dear screeners

I was wondering if these pictures of an airshow would be acceptable.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

[vcruvinel]

Dear screeners

I was wondering if these pictures of an airshow would be acceptable.

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17956[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17957[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17958[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17959[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17960[/ATTACH]

Hi,

I'm not from the crew, but IMHO:

1 & 2 needs more contrast
3-5 looks ok

Wait more comments from the screeners as well.

Cheers,

Vinicius

[dlowwa]

Dear screeners

I was wondering if these pictures of an airshow would be acceptable.

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17956[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17957[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17958[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17959[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]17960[/ATTACH]

1. dark/contrast
2. dark, motive
3-5 motive

Images with easily identifiable faces (other than pilots, etc.) are not allowed.

[pauwelsc]

1. dark/contrast
2. dark, motive
3-5 motive

Images with easily identifiable faces (other than pilots, etc.) are not allowed.

That's why I set nrs. 3-5 here just to be sure so I don't get any weird rejections. Thanks a lot for your time!

[pauwelsc]

Dear screeners,

Could you have a look on these pictures? Nrs. 1-4 could form a problem for a motive rejection but firstly I want to point out that on these pictures the people aren't identifiable, by some of them you can only see the back. Nr. 5 is a sunset shot, looking forward to know your opinion.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

[dlowwa]

Dear screeners,

Could you have a look on these pictures? Nrs. 1-4 could form a problem for a motive rejection but firstly I want to point out that on these pictures the people aren't identifiable, by some of them you can only see the back. Nr. 5 is a sunset shot, looking forward to your opinion.

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18337[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18338[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18339[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18340[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18341[/ATTACH]

1. dark/contrast
2-3 borderline contrast
4. borderline dark/contrast
5. dark/contrast

[pauwelsc]

Dear screeners

Today the Sea King performed a formation flight to 'celebrate' their retirement.
I am wondering how I need to upload this. It was taken at EBFN.

Thanks

[dlowwa]

Dear screeners

Today the Sea King performed a formation flight to 'celebrate' their retirement.
I am wondering how I need to upload this. It was taken at EBFN.

Thanks
[ATTACH=CONFIG]20550[/ATTACH]

Please use info for nearest helicopter.

[pauwelsc]

Please use info for nearest helicopter.

It Will probably be considered similar with a close-up already in queue from for example the one on the right? Both registered rs-04.

thank you for your help!

[dlowwa]

It Will probably be considered similar with a close-up already in queue from for example the one on the right? Both registered rs-04.

thank you for your help!

If from the same date, then yes similar.