MartinezRoe7 - Editing Advice

[MartinezRoe7]

All of them suffer from poor light / slight underexposure / lack of contrast
In addition:
1: soft
4: oversharpen
5: obstruction/clutter

Thanks Gerardo!

[LX-A343]

Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

Thanks in advance. Regards!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13782[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13783[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13784[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13785[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13786[/ATTACH]

All of them suffer from poor light / slight underexposure / lack of contrast
In addition:
1: soft
4: oversharpen
5: obstruction/clutter

[MartinezRoe7]

Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

Thanks in advance. Regards!

[MartinezRoe7]

1. borderline overprocessed
2. ok
3. soft/blurry
4. borderline soft
5. ok

Thanks Dana!!

[dlowwa]

Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

Thanks in advance. Regards!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13764[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13765[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13766[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13767[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13768[/ATTACH]

1. borderline overprocessed
2. ok
3. soft/blurry
4. borderline soft
5. ok

[MartinezRoe7]

Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

Thanks in advance. Regards!

[MartinezRoe7]

At first, thank your warm words!

For the Question to the Jaggies. Jaggies are those zig-zag lines in the image.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13698[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]13699[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]13700[/ATTACH]
If you see those, you can be sure that the picture is oversharpened. Hope this is clear now. If not, here is the Wikipedia-Site for it.

More technical, impossible! Great!!



#1 looks a bit soft to me and it can profit from a bit more contrast too
#2 same as #1
#3 can profit from a bit more sharpening otherwise should be ok
#4 OK
#5 contrast because there is no direct sun on the aircraft, so if you have one with direct sun, i would try this.

Hope this helps, have a nice evening.

More technical, impossible! Great!!
Millions of thanks, Julian!

[Julian S.]

Hi Julian!

How good it is to see you as a JP crew, congratulations!
With regard to the rejections, I imagined that it was Cargo, seeing the rejection I just understood that it was a charge. With regard to the "Jaggies", the first time I read that word, so I don't understand in a photo what it refers to (excuse my ignorance). Could you ask for help with this picture? (for inbox?)

As always, thanks for your tips!

Regards, from Chile

At first, thanks for your warm words!

For the Question to the Jaggies. Jaggies are those zig-zag lines in the image.

If you see those, you can be sure that the picture is oversharpened. Hope this is clear now. If not, here is the Wikipedia-Site for it.

Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

Thanks in advance. Regards!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13691[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13692[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13693[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13694[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13695[/ATTACH]

#1 looks a bit soft to me and it can profit from a bit more contrast too
#2 same as #1
#3 can profit from a bit more sharpening otherwise should be ok
#4 OK
#5 contrast because there is no direct sun on the aircraft, so if you have one with direct sun, i would try this.

Hope this helps, have a nice evening.

[MartinezRoe7]

Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

Thanks in advance. Regards!

[MartinezRoe7]

Hello

If you can see in the first Picture, there are some Jaggies who leads to the oversharpened rejection. Cargo should be the ticked, yes.
The second picture looks more blurry than soft, so not sure if you can fix this. But probably you have another picture of this plane and can try this.

Hope this helps, have a nice evening!

Hi Julian!

How good it is to see you as a JP crew, congratulations!
With regard to the rejections, I imagined that it was Cargo, seeing the rejection I just understood that it was a charge. With regard to the "Jaggies", the first time I read that word, so I don't understand in a photo what it refers to (excuse my ignorance). Could you ask for help with this picture? (for inbox?)

As always, thanks for your tips!

Regards, from Chile

[Julian S.]

Hello, I would like to know your opinion regarding this rejection.

I understand that in the first, with the SuperTanker, I failed to add that it corresponds to the "Cargo" category, right?

Thanks in advance!

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6366848

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6366842

Hello

If you can see in the first Picture, there are some Jaggies who leads to the oversharpened rejection. Cargo should be the ticked, yes.
The second picture looks more blurry than soft, so not sure if you can fix this. But probably you have another picture of this plane and can try this.

Hope this helps, have a nice evening!

[MartinezRoe7]

Hello, I would like to know your opinion regarding this rejection.

I understand that in the first, with the SuperTanker, I failed to add that it corresponds to the "Cargo" category, right?

Thanks in advance!

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6366848

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6366842

[MartinezRoe7]

1. soft, heat haze
2. soft, contrast
3. heat haze, color, oversharpened
4. borderline soft
5. borderline soft/heat haze

Thanks Dana!

[dlowwa]

Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

Thanks in advance. Regards!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13678[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13679[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13680[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13681[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13682[/ATTACH]

1. soft, heat haze
2. soft, contrast
3. heat haze, color, oversharpened
4. borderline soft
5. borderline soft/heat haze

[MartinezRoe7]

Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

Thanks in advance. Regards!