If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
no. 1 dark soft and a tad noisy
no 2 contrast
no.3 borderline contrast, also a bit washed out on the front
no.4 looks overesposed
0. 5 contrast, overexposed front and rest of the a/c in the shadow
no. 1 dark soft and a tad noisy
no 2 contrast
no.3 borderline contrast, also a bit washed out on the front
no.4 looks overesposed
0. 5 contrast, overexposed front and rest of the a/c in the shadow
All would be rejected, for the same reasons mentioned previously. It seems you're not really paying too much attention to the advice/feedback you're getting, as many of these have exactly the same flaws as previous versions you've posted. I appreciate this is a learning process, but there's usually a learning curve - over time (and getting feedback on so many images), we would hope that you would take away a fundamental understanding of the acceptance requirements, and slowly start to internalize them. However, most of these are not really close to being acceptable, so I start to wonder: are you taking the feedback, and trying to adjust the problems areas (or even recognizing these problem areas exist), or are you just posting as many images as you can, as often as you can hoping we will say some are ok? If the latter, then I don't think you're really using this forum in the way it is intended.
We're here to help you improve your techniques and thus your ability to get images accepted, but is that really what you're doing here? It seems more like it's simply a way for you to in effect skip the queue.
All would be rejected, for the same reasons mentioned previously. It seems you're not really paying too much attention to the advice/feedback you're getting, as many of these have exactly the same flaws as previous versions you've posted. I appreciate this is a learning process, but there's usually a learning curve - over time (and getting feedback on so many images), we would hope that you would take away a fundamental understanding of the acceptance requirements, and slowly start to internalize them. However, most of these are not really close to being acceptable, so I start to wonder: are you taking the feedback, and trying to adjust the problems areas (or even recognizing these problem areas exist), or are you just posting as many images as you can, as often as you can hoping we will say some are ok? If the latter, then I don't think you're really using this forum in the way it is intended.
We're here to help you improve your techniques and thus your ability to get images accepted, but is that really what you're doing here? It seems more like it's simply a way for you to in effect skip the queue.
No, it's not that you mention.
I just use this forum and publish the photos because I went from JPEG to RAW. Over time I have learned different procedures that are wrong on my part, as well as confirming those that are well done. In each photo that I publish I have my doubts, doubts that, perhaps, are the same as the previous ones but that when taken out in JPEG I don't know if they have a good process of photographs. I must also be honest when I say that, sometimes, I take the opportunity to see if a picture skips the row ... but that is not always.
Likewise, I confirm that the learning curve has been effective in me. From happening to having 20 rejections today I have 10 approvals and 2 rejections. Somehow it has been thanks to the readings of this forum, the help provided by screeners who kindly take the time to explain each situation (Julian, Alex, Gerardo, Pamela ...). It's necessary to explain that although I understand English, many times I don't understand what they explain to me, for which I must use a translator (as I did with your explanation / discussion). Many times I understand the translated, in others I don't understand.
On the other hand, and to finish (and waiting for your feeback or response), I have been as I'm .. humbly I thank you every time you analyze the photographs. You don't know how grateful I'm that I see your name in the comments of the photos, but I feel that it bothers you that I upload photos every day for analysis. It's not the first time that you have complained about something simple (the last time you told me you were wasting your time). However, I see other members who also upload photos that have previously gone up, with the same errors as the previous ones and I don't see any claim.
I hope you don't mind my answer, but I have tried to be honest enough about this issue.
I hope you have a good day. I remain attentive to your response.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment