Editing Advice - DanielK225

[Guest]

Could I please get some thoughts on this please. Would it be rejected for the lights which were caused by refraction from the glass.

Thanks,
Daniel

[LX-A343]

Could I please get some thoughts on this please. Would it be rejected for the lights which were caused by refraction from the glass.

Thanks,
Daniel

Because of that and because it is softy and slightly noisy.

[Guest]

Hi, I had this rejected for soft around the rear part of the shot.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8849471

I've attempted a re-edit of it and have attached it below. Has it improved, or still the same softness. I'm struggling to see the issue area, so could it also be pointed out.

Thanks, Daniel

[dlowwa]

Hi, I had this rejected for soft around the rear part of the shot.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8849471

I've attempted a re-edit of it and have attached it below. Has it improved, or still the same softness. I'm struggling to see the issue area, so could it also be pointed out.

Thanks, Daniel

Image is blurry and noisy/compressed from too much noise reduction. It is not fixable, better to move on to a different image.

[Guest]

Could I please get your opinion on this edit please?

[dlowwa]

Could I please get your opinion on this edit please?

A significant amount of noise/compression is visible.