Originally posted by VH-ROB
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pre Screening Advice - Robbie Mathieson
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Hi all, in reference to https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7085691
how can I avoid getting compression rejections? There's nothing I've changed in my editing workflow that I feel would lead to a compression rejection. Only thing I can think of would be having uploaded at 1024 but I highly doubt that's the case. Many Thanks, Robbie
Comment
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View PostHi all, in reference to https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7085691
how can I avoid getting compression rejections? There's nothing I've changed in my editing workflow that I feel would lead to a compression rejection. Only thing I can think of would be having uploaded at 1024 but I highly doubt that's the case. Many Thanks, Robbie
Comment
-
Hi All, a few questions in regards to https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7161632.
It's just been rejected for manipulation, and the rejection email states that the bottom shows signs of cloning. I'm assuming that the screener means the part on the left hand side? This is actually part of the airport perimeter fence, and obviously, if I was to clone it out, it would then be rejected fro manipulation. What would you suggest that I do in this instance? Would the photo be best left for my personal collection?
Many Thanks, Robbie
Comment
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View PostHi All, a few questions in regards to https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7161632.
It's just been rejected for manipulation, and the rejection email states that the bottom shows signs of cloning. I'm assuming that the screener means the part on the left hand side? This is actually part of the airport perimeter fence, and obviously, if I was to clone it out, it would then be rejected fro manipulation. What would you suggest that I do in this instance? Would the photo be best left for my personal collection?
Many Thanks, Robbie
Comment
-
Hi guys, can I get a second opinion on this one please. I already have a photo of this aircraft in the database from this day, however the accepted photo is a take-off shot compared to this rejected landing shot. The upload guidelines state2.6 Similar - "a photo taken from the same sequence the same day e. landing, taxiing, ramp parking or take off"
Rejected photo (landing) - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7205789
Accepted photo (take-off) - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9175846
Comment
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View PostHi guys, can I get a second opinion on this one please. I already have a photo of this aircraft in the database from this day, however the accepted photo is a take-off shot compared to this rejected landing shot. The upload guidelines state Now I could be reading the guidelines wrong, but I interpret that as meaning that 2x Take off shots would be rejected as similar, not 1 take off and 1 landing. Can you please confirm what the rule is. Many Thanks, Robbie
Rejected photo (landing) - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7205789
Accepted photo (take-off) - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9175846
Correct rejection. You are misreading the guideline. Pick your best shot within the given same day/sequence.
Regards TLast edited by 777MAN; 2019-04-05, 10:46.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View PostHi guys, can I get a second opinion on this one please. I already have a photo of this aircraft in the database from this day, however the accepted photo is a take-off shot compared to this rejected landing shot. The upload guidelines state Now I could be reading the guidelines wrong, but I interpret that as meaning that 2x Take off shots would be rejected as similar, not 1 take off and 1 landing. Can you please confirm what the rule is. Many Thanks, Robbie
Rejected photo (landing) - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7205789
Accepted photo (take-off) - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9175846
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostWhile some same side take off/landing images might both be acceptable as they are technically different sequences, they would need to be quite different. Yours are very similar, so yes, the rejection was correct. If you want to be certain that 'similar' won't apply, the rule of one image per side in the air and one per side on the ground is generally useful. There may be exceptions, but as I stated, the images would need to be quite different.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View PostThanks Dana, please accept my apologies as I must've totally missed reading about when the rule changed from the previous wording. Perhaps it may be an idea in the future to email all uploaders explining changes, as I daresay I'm probably not the only one who hasn't realised when changes to the upload guidelines have been made,
Comment
-
Hi all, can I have a second opinion on https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7219506 please. Regarding obstructing objects/clutter, the upload guidelines state that bothExceptions may be made if the equipment forms part of the motive of the shotif the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed
Comment
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View PostHi all, can I have a second opinion on https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7219506 please. Regarding obstructing objects/clutter, the upload guidelines state that both . In my opinion, considering the two sections of the upload guidelines that I've quoted, this photo should've been accepted. Many Thanks, Robbie
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostWould have been a rejection for me as well if I had screened it. If it weren't blocking the main gear, probably would have been ok. Generally tugs only get away with blocking the nose gear (if they're actually in the process of towing). Anything more than that, and an obstruction rejection is likely, as was the case here.
Comment
Comment