john1024 - prescreening request / editing advice

[john1024]

Dear JP
Does these picture get a chance to be acceppted. It's a scan from an very old negative. I really like the plane and that's why i ask you about your opinion. Is there any thing that could be fixed? or is there no chance?

Thanks in advance

[dlowwa]

Dear JP
Does these picture get a chance to be acceppted. It's a scan from an very old negative. I really like the plane and that's why i ask you about your opinion. Is there any thing that could be fixed? or is there no chance?

Thanks in advance

Quality looks acceptable for age. Maybe just needs a little CW rotation.

[john1024]

Dear JP

I just saw a error in the DB

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9648059

Unfortunately it's no a caravelle. Could you change it?
Correct HB-JCO.

Od do I have to upload it again and you delete these one?

[dlowwa]

Dear JP

I just saw a error in the DB

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9648059

Unfortunately it's no a caravelle. Could you change it?
Correct HB-JCO.

Od do I have to upload it again and you delete these one?

Will fix it, thanks.

[john1024]

Dear JP community
I got a rejection due to following reasons:

• Undersharpened (Soft)
• Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)
• Too much or too little contrast

My question is, is it worth to work on in:
1: Undersharpened is fixable as the RAW is perfect in focus
2: What is the reason. Su much saturation? Bad whitebalance?
3: Is that ficable? (it's a nightshot).

I love these picture because of the reflection on the wet ground.
Thanks for your help in advance.

[dlowwa]

Dear JP community
I got a rejection due to following reasons:

• Undersharpened (Soft)
• Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)
• Too much or too little contrast

My question is, is it worth to work on in:
1: Undersharpened is fixable as the RAW is perfect in focus
2: What is the reason. Su much saturation? Bad whitebalance?
3: Is that ficable? (it's a nightshot).

I love these picture because of the reflection on the wet ground.
Thanks for your help in advance.

Can't really help you here, I voted accept on that one Sharpness looks fine to me, though I can understand the contrast issue as the light's not the best. Color I also don't think has much to be improved since you're trying to balance the natural and artificial light in the scene. If you Want to try again, try lifting the shadows a bit and going with a slightly warmer white balance.

[LX-A343]

Dear JP community
I got a rejection due to following reasons:

• Undersharpened (Soft)
• Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)
• Too much or too little contrast

My question is, is it worth to work on in:
1: Undersharpened is fixable as the RAW is perfect in focus
2: What is the reason. Su much saturation? Bad whitebalance?
3: Is that ficable? (it's a nightshot).

I love these picture because of the reflection on the wet ground.
Thanks for your help in advance.

There was maybe a bit too much of that red colour cast for the screener(s) involved. Brighten the shadows and midtones a bit up, and reduce the red colour a tiny bit. That's at least what I would do. Also, re-check the horizon. Being a local spotter there, my gut feeling tells me, it is slightly leaning to the left.

EDIT: apparently it took me at least 7 minutes to check the photo in Photoshop and post my comment here

[john1024]

Thank you all very much for the help, I try with the suggested edit. Looking forward.

[john1024]

Dear all

I got a rejection for following tow pichtures:
1: Tu 154: Too much or too Too much or too little contrast. What is missing here. For my understanding it's a bright sunny day, so the contrast should be ok. Why is there a contrast issue.
2: Also rejection becaus off Over Processed / Bad postprocessing. I know it's har at the edge of backlight. But with that reason of rejection is it pssible to re-edit the picture? What is overprocessed or not done right?

Thanks a lot fo all your great help.

[dlowwa]

Dear all

I got a rejection for following tow pichtures:
1: Tu 154: Too much or too Too much or too little contrast. What is missing here. For my understanding it's a bright sunny day, so the contrast should be ok. Why is there a contrast issue.

Contrast much too harsh.

2: Also rejection becaus off Over Processed / Bad postprocessing. I know it's har at the edge of backlight. But with that reason of rejection is it pssible to re-edit the picture? What is overprocessed or not done right?

Not really sure what's wrong with the processing.

[john1024]

Please help me to understand the contrast issue. I got rejection of contrast.
What do I have to pay attention? It was early in the morning (night shot added) and the contrast is for my understanding as much as possible. The histogram looks for me right, nothing wa clipped. The whites are almost at the end, but they were yellowish because of the sunrise.
What do I have to adjust?

The rejected foto is here:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8264086

Thanks for helping me.

john

[dlowwa]

Please help me to understand the contrast issue. I got rejection of contrast.
What do I have to pay attention? It was early in the morning (night shot added) and the contrast is for my understanding as much as possible. The histogram looks for me right, nothing wa clipped. The whites are almost at the end, but they were yellowish because of the sunrise.
What do I have to adjust?

The rejected foto is here:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8264086

Thanks for helping me.

john

Contrast is a bit harsh (shadows too strong), but that's a relatively minor issue. Bigger problem is the sharpness. Unfortunately for whatever reason (distance/haze, lens softness), the quality really isn't there for 1920pix. You might be able to hide it at 1280, so if you were to try again with a small adjustment to the contrast, I'd recommend at a lower resolution.

[john1024]

thanks dlowwa for all your help and hint's. I really appreciate it.

[john1024]

Dear JP
I'm not sure of uploading concerning case of backlight:
- Would that be rejected in terms of backlight (or any other reasons)
-As you see on the shadow an the fin, it's not backlight, but very close to.

Thanks for help and advice.

john

[dlowwa]

Dear JP
I'm not sure of uploading concerning case of backlight:
- Would that be rejected in terms of backlight (or any other reasons)
-As you see on the shadow an the fin, it's not backlight, but very close to.

Thanks for help and advice.

john

Not quite backlit, but quality isn't really there for 1850pix, and looks like it needs CCW rotation.