Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bapt0708: Pre-screening/How to do a better editing ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Normally this is better.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26045[/ATTACH]
    Unsharpened a little bit.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26046[/ATTACH]
    1. horizon ok, but too low in the frame now
    2. borderline oversharpened

    Last time to comment on these.

    Leave a comment:


  • bapt0708
    replied
    Normally this is better.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0429.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	592.2 KB
ID:	1040571
    Unsharpened a little bit.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0470.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	505.1 KB
ID:	1040572

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Reworked the 777.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26014[/ATTACH]
    Reworked the 737 from a previous version.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26015[/ATTACH]
    Last question, how can you see that a photo need a rotation ? I aligned the 777 with the ground before, and it was not good.
    1. needs CW rotation. all background vertical references are leaning left.
    2. borderline oversharpened

    Leave a comment:


  • bapt0708
    replied
    Reworked the 777.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0429.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	620.6 KB
ID:	1040544
    Reworked the 737 from a previous version.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0470.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	491.5 KB
ID:	1040545
    Last question, how can you see that a photo need a rotation ? I aligned the 777 with the ground before, and it was not good.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
    I lined up the photos with the building is it better ?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25995[/ATTACH]
    Removed the birds and added sharpening.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25996[/ATTACH]
    1. still needs CW. also soft in spots
    2. oversharpened now

    Leave a comment:


  • bapt0708
    replied
    I lined up the photos with the building is it better ?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0429.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	604.8 KB
ID:	1040527
    Removed the birds and added sharpening.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0470.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	519.2 KB
ID:	1040528

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
    I reworked all of them.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25965[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25966[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25967[/ATTACH]
    I removed some birds.
    What are you saying by horizon ?
    1. ok
    2. needs CW rotation
    3. still soft towards nose & birds

    Leave a comment:


  • bapt0708
    replied
    I reworked all of them.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0306.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	548.0 KB
ID:	1040503
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0429.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	651.0 KB
ID:	1040504
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0470.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	497.4 KB
ID:	1040505
    I removed some birds.
    What are you saying by horizon ?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
    No problem, your help is really appreciated.

    May i have a pre-screening please.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25956[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25957[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25958[/ATTACH]
    Thank you.
    1. soft
    2. borderline soft/horizon
    3. soft, overprocessed

    Don't see any dust spots, but the birds would be better off removed since some could consider them dirt.

    Leave a comment:


  • bapt0708
    replied
    No problem, your help is really appreciated.

    May i have a pre-screening please.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0306.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	533.3 KB
ID:	1040497
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0429.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	614.6 KB
ID:	1040498
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0470.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	582.6 KB
ID:	1040499
    Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Reworked it.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25939[/ATTACH]
    I still can't see anything, but i passed the corrector below the tail.
    Overprocessed/manipulation for bad edit/dust removal below tail, and oversharpened. Not going to comment on this image any more.

    Leave a comment:


  • bapt0708
    replied
    Reworked it.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	530.0 KB
ID:	1040481
    I still can't see anything, but i passed the corrector below the tail.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Reworked it, is it better ? I didn't see any more dust spots where are they ?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25937[/ATTACH]
    Soft, and at least one dust spot below tail.

    Leave a comment:


  • bapt0708
    replied
    Reworked it, is it better ? I didn't see any more dust spots where are they ?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	524.7 KB
ID:	1040479

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Is it better now ?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25931[/ATTACH]
    Oversharpened and dust spots.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X