So, right after reaching FL380, PF repeatedly said he had lost control of the airplane. Seconds later, PNF took control using the priority button, announcing "controls to the left" and moved his sidestick to the left. Immediately, PF retook control using his priority button, without any announcement.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Air France 447 - On topic only!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Black Ram View PostIs the Junior F/O, the PF, the stubborn one? I read somewhere it seems 2 minutes before impact the PNF wanted to take control, but the Junior PF brushed him off. But from what I've read so far, no one identified the stall.
Yes to all, hélas.
From the beginning, relationship between the three pilots seems strange.
I hope someone will able to translate the dialogue for you.
@@++
Comment
-
Originally posted by Black Ram View PostBut from what I've read so far, no one identified the stall.
What didn't happen was the FORMAL identification and addressing.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostI think as soon as you go off autoflight [etc, etc, etc and more etc] Or automation...
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gabriel View PostSure they did. If their airmanship was not enough to recognize a stall situation, an aural warning shouting STALL STALL STALL over an over sure had to be a clue.
Comment
-
Black Ram and his narrative have me wondering if perhaps we are witness to the first of some odd video game related syndrome. Just the comments about the way one brushes off the other or Drizzt says they can't work well together.
I starts to sound more like two teenagers locked in a video game of "Mortal Kombat" or something.
Is it possible that they block out the circuits that hard wire them to reality and it becomes a game?
What is this translation of the CVR going to tell us? Right now without anything it leaves the imagination to roam at will. Maybe they are not acting like they are flying an airplane because when the old hand checked out they stopped flying and the the game started. Yeah, this is rubber room material but then?Live, from a grassy knoll somewhere near you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Black Ram View PostSo, right after reaching FL380, PF repeatedly said he had lost control of the airplane. Seconds later, PNF took control using the priority button, announcing "controls to the left" and moved his sidestick to the left. Immediately, PF retook control using his priority button, without any announcement.
2 h 10 min 06 - A/P disconnects, F/O (PF) takes priority.
2 h 11 min 32 - F/O declares that he has lost control of the airplane.
2 h 11 min 38 - The PIC takes control from the F/O by requesting priority.
2 h 12 min 16 - The F/O takes control from the PIC by requesting priority.
2 h 12 min 59 - The PIC makes stick movements without requesting priority.
2 h 13 min 23 - The PIC makes stick movements again without requesting priority. « Dual input » warning sounds.
2 h 13 min 41 - VS : « Dual input »
2 h 13 min 43 - VS : « Dual input »
2 h 13 min 45 - VS : « Dual input »
2 h 13 min 47 - VS : « Dual input »
2 h 13 min 45 - PIC asks for priority, F/O gives over priority to PIC.
2 h 14 min 21 - F/O takes priority from PIC without requesting priority (not much being said at that point).
Either pilot can 'latch' priority by holding down the priority button. This deactivates the other stick, but it takes 40 seconds of holding the button down. Even then, the other pilot can simply reactivate his stick by pushing his priority button. Whoever pushes their button last has priority.
The system obviously wasn't designed for combative behavior.
Lack of training in manual flight/UAS + lack of CRM = fin.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostLack of training in manual flight/UAS + lack of CRM = fin.
Isn't a term missing from your addition?
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gabriel View PostAhem! I thought we had reached an agreement.
Isn't a term missing from your addition?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Black Ram View PostThe captain had probably returned only after the STALL warnings, but there were signs - difficulty controlling pitch and roll, the aircraft rolling right, when the stick was all the way left.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostIt's basically the French revolution up there. It seems to me that the PIC is the one violating the CRM.
Comment
-
Is the pilot in the left seat by tradition the PIC?
In your world of regulated aviation, who is legally the PIC who get's to make the log book entry?
If the Captain goes off the flight deck to satisfy a regulatory or rest requirement someone has to be designated.
It actually sounds like these two "FO" types were in a PIC whizzing contest. I have obviously never been in the position to make that decision. In my simple bottom feeder world if the other guy said "My airplane" it probably was or his name was on the rental receipt/club member.Live, from a grassy knoll somewhere near you.
Comment
Comment