Where did that show up? Eyewitness after an event are often not reliable. Could they have been just "pilot like" and in uniform. As a military flight there must have been, how many others in uniform aboard?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Polish President and wife killed in Tu-154 crash
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Calm down Evan.
Originally posted by Evan View PostWell, they didn't do so well with the CVR part of that, did they?
Originally posted by Evan View PostSo, if the Russians withhold information it is a lack of 'transparency', but if the Polish withhold information, it is conformity to the Chicago Convention?
Comment
-
I will have to dig deeper to try to find the source, but I just remember on the day of the crash, or day after, someone reporting about it. Whoever that was, I think the possibility of an error is small (if the source is realiable, of course) - when you see someone strapped to a seat in front of an instrument panel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Northwester View PostOn the other hand, there was some report of an eye witness stating that he saw pilots strapped in their seats in a broken cockpit right after the crash.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Northwester View PostI will have to dig deeper to try to find the source, but I just remember on the day of the crash, or day after, someone reporting about it. Whoever that was, I think the possibility of an error is small (if the source is realiable, of course) - when you see someone strapped to a seat in front of an instrument panel.
When a plane rolls inverted and crashes nose first at 300 km/h, and considering that the cockpit is in the very front on the plane and in the upper half of the fuselage, and that the cockpit will be almost the fist thing to impact and not happy with that, the rest of the plane will crash into it, I doubt very much that you will end up finding the pilot strapped to a seat in front of an instrument panel or that zone of the fuselage in a relatively good shape as apparently shown in the other photo.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter_K View PostCalm down Evan.
Originally posted by Peter_K View PostWhat information did the Russians withhold? I think you are confusing something here once again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gabriel View PostNorthwester,
When a plane rolls inverted and crashes nose first at 300 km/h, and considering that the cockpit is in the very front on the plane and in the upper half of the fuselage, and that the cockpit will be almost the fist thing to impact and not happy with that, the rest of the plane will crash into it, I doubt very much that you will end up finding the pilot strapped to a seat in front of an instrument panel or that zone of the fuselage in a relatively good shape as apparently shown in the other photo.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Evan View Post
I never said the Russians withheld anything. I'm just trying to point out that this so-called lack of transparency I keep hearing about from conspiracy theorists is coming from both sides of the investigation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Northwester View PostI do not dispute that. But we don't know what hit the ground first. Some people say the wing - we don't know in what point of the axial rotation the body was exactly when it hit the ground.
Maybe a wingtip hit first. But the best evidence we have so far (the trees damage, ground marks and debris pattern) strongly suggest that the plane hit the ground inverted and in a nose down attitude. I don't think that, in that condition, whether the wingtip or the windshield hit 0,01 seconds before the other will make a difference in the outcome regarding what I've said in the previous post (that there will not be a pilot strapped in front of an instrument panel and there will not be a largely intact cockpit section of the fuselage), right?
I'm trying to be constructive with whatever little information we have, and we are all playing parlour talk and dumb guesses with that.
With what we know, I judge incredibly much higher the chance that the cockpit was destroyed in the accident than that the pilot was found strapped in front of the panel and the photo shows an almost intact cockpit section and that all these facts were hidden by a conspiracy by the corrupt Ruskis to hide their true guilt in this intentional magnicide.
Ok, we don't know for sure 100% that it was inverted and nose low.
Next, close the thread. (Or are you 100% sure of something as to go on with it?)
Please let's (all of we) steer back the thread into the parlour talk and dumb guessing with what we have and with what becomes available as it does.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostNeither the Russians nor the Polish have let us know what happened. Both must have seen the FDR information. Both must know what happened.
Comment
Comment