Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Malaysia Airlines Loses Contact With 777 en Route to Beijing

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AirDisaster.com Forum Member 2004-2008

    Originally posted by orangehuggy
    the most dangerous part of a flight is not the take off or landing anymore, its when a flight crew member goes to the toilet

    Comment


    • Apparently another piece of debris has been found on a sandbank off the coast of Mozambique that is 'highly probable' that it came from a 777.

      Malaysia says there is a "high possibility" debris found off Mozambique came from a Boeing 777, the same model as missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by sjwk View Post
        Apparently another piece of debris has been found on a sandbank off the coast of Mozambique that is 'highly probable' that it came from a 777.

        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35709867
        Rumour has it as a piece of horizontal stabizer skin measuring 20 x 30 inches. Perhaps more will now be found...

        Comment






        • AirDisaster.com Forum Member 2004-2008

          Originally posted by orangehuggy
          the most dangerous part of a flight is not the take off or landing anymore, its when a flight crew member goes to the toilet

          Comment




          • AirDisaster.com Forum Member 2004-2008

            Originally posted by orangehuggy
            the most dangerous part of a flight is not the take off or landing anymore, its when a flight crew member goes to the toilet

            Comment


            • And in other news, a UFO hunter scouring Google Earth claims to have found the plane under the water off the Cape of Good Hope, where he claims that it had drifted over the past 16 months from the crash site, remaining completely intact despite being shallow enough to be seen but apparently not broken up by the sort of waves that area is renowned for...

              Apparently he must be right because he used to work for the USAF before becoming editor of UFO Sightings Daily.

              COULD this fuzzy outline beneath the waves be the final resting place of the missing Malaysia Airlines MH370 plane?

              Comment


              • ....and he has a brand new tinfoil hat as well !!
                If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !

                Comment


                • ODD ... there is no growth on that part. looks like it broke off yesterday.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Bryan View Post
                    ODD ... there is no growth on that part. looks like it broke off yesterday.
                    If the part was washed ashore could the sun have bleached any marine growth?

                    Comment


                    • I imagine not every surface is equally suitable for marine growth.

                      Comment


                      • Reports coming in of a 3rd object found at La Reunion, found in the immediate vicinity of where the flaperon was discovered

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	Ccw0sWYW0AAxACw-e1457211982713.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	60.7 KB
ID:	1015123
                        AirDisaster.com Forum Member 2004-2008

                        Originally posted by orangehuggy
                        the most dangerous part of a flight is not the take off or landing anymore, its when a flight crew member goes to the toilet

                        Comment


                        • Paper by Paul Smithson: Head for Home
                          A theory of MH370’s disappearance and final resting place
                          - February 1, 2016
                          AirDisaster.com Forum Member 2004-2008

                          Originally posted by orangehuggy
                          the most dangerous part of a flight is not the take off or landing anymore, its when a flight crew member goes to the toilet

                          Comment


                          • It all seems well-researched and plausible except for this plot convenience:

                            The #1 assumptions is: Unknown event / chain of events prompted diversion

                            As you may recall, this is the tricky part. There are a finite list of possibilities here. Whatever occurred has to fit with the particular known facts. We know that there was no communication from the cockpit and that automated comm systems and downlinked info (ADS-B, ACARS) also immediately ceased. We also know that the plane continued to fly for many hours on a fixed course after this 'unknown event' and the onboard avionics responded to handshake signals. These circumstances rule out everything we have been able to imagine except an intentional murdercide scenario. A loss of electrical power doesn't explain it. A sudden castastrophic event such as a bomb or airframe failure doesn't explain it. No system failure we have postulated can explain it, not even considering a cascade of codependent system failures. I've been through the systems on that plane as best I can and nothing fits.

                            You can't present a theory postulated on a plot convenience. But perhaps, if the 'event' was a murdercide, the rest is viable.

                            There may be a failure scenario that we haven't considered, but this is the first question that must be solved for this theory to be viable.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Peter Kesternich View Post
                              I imagine not every surface is equally suitable for marine growth.
                              I imagine that Bryan knows that. While he only listed one item, I think his point was that the part looked very pristine for having been in the water for over a year- subject to bleaching effects of sun, solution effects of water, AND biological effects.

                              And, I dunno, I've seen marine growth on a wide variety of substrates. As a whole, it doesn't seem too picky.
                              Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Evan View Post
                                We know that there was no communication from the cockpit and that automated comm systems and downlinked info (ADS-B, ACARS) also immediately ceased.
                                My understanding is that ACARS went offline first. Is this correct?

                                The last position report transmitted via ACARS at 1707:29 UTC, 07 March 2014 [0107:29
                                MYT, 08 March 2014] recorded remaining fuel of 43, 800 kg at 35,004 ft. altitude.
                                At 1719:30 UTC [0119:30 MYT], MH370 acknowledged with “Good night Malaysia Three
                                Seven Zero”. This was the last recorded radio transmission from MH370.
                                Can ACARS be disabled from where the Captain is sitting?
                                AirDisaster.com Forum Member 2004-2008

                                Originally posted by orangehuggy
                                the most dangerous part of a flight is not the take off or landing anymore, its when a flight crew member goes to the toilet

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X