Originally posted by Gabriel
View Post
However, here's some speculation: As discussed in this thread (and even relevant to the G6 over run), this crash is not consistent with "the rule" that after V1, you fly unless there's a really really really dang good and clear reason not to....
Ass-hat parlour talkers would say that this flight should have continued and not made an emergency landing and certain over run after taking flight- let alone after V1.
Edit: Made the font really big on my main point.
No doubt, lawyers from numerous sides are watching every tiny bit of this crash trying to figure out "the blame" and there's probably quite a few $$ involved.
So the official agency may be keeping the cards very close to their chests until they are ready to publish conclusions...
This incident may be a highly charged interaction of human performance, rules, automation, mechanical stuff, training...
Comment