planespotter.lars Editing/Pre-screening advice

[dlowwa]

Thanks, Dana. What about the Beluga two posts above?

Borderline for overexposed/horizon.

[planespotter.lars]

Borderline soft/overexposed, but ok for me.

Thanks, Dana. What about the Beluga two posts above?

[dlowwa]

Good evening,
Would like to hear your opinion about this one, too.

Borderline soft/overexposed, but ok for me.

[planespotter.lars]

Good evening,
Would like to hear your opinion about this one, too.
Thanks in advance and best regards,
Lars

[planespotter.lars]

Good morning Dana,
This shot should be okay but as I have never uploaded a Beluga XL before I‘d like to know if the crop etc. is fine.
Best regards,
Lars

[planespotter.lars]

Image was not submitted within the allowable size range of 4:3 to 16:9.

God damn it I thought 16:10 was still allowed so my bad, sorry for the stupid appeal.

Also please read here very carefully, especially #8:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

"this picture was prescreened by Dana and she (he) said it was absolutely alright" is not an acceptable appeal reason, and if repeated will lead to me no longer commenting on your images.

I am sincerely sorry that I didn't take that into account, must have been too long since I last read that thread. I ensure you that this will not happen again as I really don't want to lose this nice opportunity of getting pictures prescreened at all.
Best regards and my apologies for the mistake,
Lars

[dlowwa]

Oh did not know that, thanks for clarifying. Just thought it'd be a good idea to upload nice shots from the time I had the 1280px limit with 1600 or 1920px now.
Furthermore I yesterday evening submitted an appeal but as only god knows why, I did not receive any Mail regarding the status. Would be cool if you coul check it for me. Photo ID is 9138879.
Best regards,
Lars

Image was not submitted within the allowable size range of 4:3 to 16:9.

Also please read here very carefully, especially #8:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/aviation-photography-videography-forums/digital-photo-processing-forum/63048-suggestions-when-asking-for-editing-advice-prescreening-from-crew

"this picture was prescreened by Dana and she (he) said it was absolutely alright" is not an acceptable appeal reason, and if repeated will lead to me no longer commenting on your images.

[planespotter.lars]

Google: Lens vignetting.



Not sure that we accept re-uploads simply for better resolution.

Oh did not know that, thanks for clarifying. Just thought it'd be a good idea to upload nice shots from the time I had the 1280px limit with 1600 or 1920px now.
Furthermore I yesterday evening submitted an appeal but as only god knows why, I did not receive any Mail regarding the status. Would be cool if you coul check it for me. Photo ID is 9138879.
Best regards,
Lars

[dlowwa]

Just by any chance, do you know how this vignetting could be caused without even processing the picture?

Google: Lens vignetting.

And another little question, today I resubmitted a picture with an higher resolution, is there any way of checking the status of the resubmission? Will I get an E-Mail? If yes Ill have to get in contact with your team as I haven't been getting Mails for ages now which I don't care about when it comes to screening but is quite tricky with appeals.

Not sure that we accept re-uploads simply for better resolution.

[planespotter.lars]

A bit dark/soft, but otherwise better than the previous.



Don't see any bad processing, just vignetting and some compression.

Just by any chance, do you know how this vignetting could be caused without even processing the picture?
And another little question, today I resubmitted a picture with an higher resolution, is there any way of checking the status of the resubmission? Will I get an E-Mail? If yes Ill have to get in contact with your team as I haven't been getting Mails for ages now which I don't care about when it comes to screening but is quite tricky with appeals.
Thanks and best regards

[dlowwa]

Jesus, what the was a dreaming of whilst editing the QR, centering and Dust Spots are steps 2&3 of my workflow and that dust spot was freaking huge.
Fixed it now:

A bit dark/soft, but otherwise better than the previous.

EDIT: This is no question for prescreening, I know the pic is in the queue and so on, but I would love to know what the heck happened to that pic if you put it into the equalized version?!
Link is: https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1620978837.jpg
As said before I know that would cause an immediate 'vignetting not allowed' oder 'bad postprocessing' rejection, but I would just like to get what the hell happened so that he equalized version looks like that, do you have any guesses or hints?

Don't see any bad processing, just vignetting and some compression.

[planespotter.lars]

1-2. Crops not my personal taste, but not automatic rejections. More of an issue with the LH, which is neither close up nor wide view.
3. too low in the frame and dust spot.

Jesus, what the was a dreaming of whilst editing the QR, centering and Dust Spots are steps 2&3 of my workflow and that dust spot was freaking huge.
Fixed it now:


EDIT: This is no question for prescreening, I know the pic is in the queue and so on, but I would love to know what the heck happened to that pic if you put it into the equalized version?!
Link is: https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1620978837.jpg
As said before I know that would cause an immediate 'vignetting not allowed' oder 'bad postprocessing' rejection, but I would just like to get what the hell happened so that he equalized version looks like that, do you have any guesses or hints?

[dlowwa]

Good morning,
I would love to see your opinion on the following pics

1-2. Crops not my personal taste, but not automatic rejections. More of an issue with the LH, which is neither close up nor wide view.
3. too low in the frame and dust spot.

[planespotter.lars]

Good morning,
I would love to see your opinion on the following pics, I think they should go through but I am concerned about Easy Jets crop.

The light on the following one is extremely trashy but I would still like to see it accepted as it's the only QR oneworld c/s I got, I hope it has got enough contrast to get accepted.

[planespotter.lars]

1. borderline contrast, but as before, acceptable for me
2-4. borderline soft.

Thanks, Dana. I added few more contrast to 1 and added it with 1400px to the queue, should be acceptable. Same goes for 2-4, I sharpened them up and uploaded them with 1250px and it actually looks quite crisp so I don't think they'll cause problems.

Already in advance, if they all get accepted, I'll finally reach the 100 accepted pics mark, which I would have never got to of if it wasn't you constantly sticking by and checking my pictures for any issues. All in all, a very big thank you.
Best regards,
Lars