Pre-screening advice

[dlowwa]

Yes I did. I don’t care about fr24.

Great. Then why does it need to be hot?

should be able to upload photos other than plain side ons.

You're more than welcome to. There is no rule against it.

The comment said “can barely be seen from this angle” so what angle should I shoot it from then?

If you want it to fall under the hot guidelines, then an angle where the change and the whole aircraft/livery can be seen. You uploaded it as hot due to the change. If the change can barely be seen from that, and the image will not be used for FR24 in any case, why should it be hot? If you want to submit it as hot, you'll need to follow the hot guidelines, as simple as that. If you don't, then upload it to the regular queue and there won't be an issue, will there?

[Joel Baverstock]

Did you read the comments with the rejection?

Yes I did. I don’t care about fr24. You should be able to upload photos other than plain side ons. The comment said “can barely be seen from this angle” so what angle should I shoot it from then?

[dlowwa]

I had this rejected as invalid hot because the new livery scheme could hardly be seen. Could someone please inform me as to how I can upload this and it not be “too small”. Not my fault the special scheme is only small https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?
id=8628334

Did you read the comments with the rejection?

[Joel Baverstock]

I had this rejected as invalid hot because the new livery scheme could hardly be seen. Could someone please inform me as to how I can upload this and it not be “too small”. Not my fault the special scheme is only small https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?
id=8628334

[dlowwa]

Would this be similar in your opinion? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9699724

No, not really.

[Joel Baverstock]

Would this be similar in your opinion? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9699724

[dlowwa]

Ok yep, thanks. And how much fence/obstruction is allowed in an image, would this be too obstructed or ok?

Not obstructed, but fence is somewhat distracting. Probably not enough for a rejection, imho.

[Joel Baverstock]

Ok yep, thanks. And how much fence/obstruction is allowed in an image, would this be too obstructed or ok?

[dlowwa]

Would this crop be ok because I am keeping the city buildings in the background or even for this image I would have to do a standard crop? (excuse the dust spots i haven't removed them yet)

Don't personally see how the buildings add much to the image.

[Joel Baverstock]

Would this crop be ok because I am keeping the city buildings in the background or even for this image I would have to do a standard crop? (excuse the dust spots i haven't removed them yet)

[dlowwa]

Is it possible to get some advice on this photo, it seems pretty good to me but I've only uploaded a cockpit shot once so not too sure what's required. Thanks

Would be ok for me.

[Joel Baverstock]

Is it possible to get some advice on this photo, it seems pretty good to me but I've only uploaded a cockpit shot once so not too sure what's required. Thanks

[dlowwa]

Similar? I'm concerned about similar because it is LH side of a/c but is the composition different enough to be deemed not similar? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9900385

Different sides. Not similar.

[Joel Baverstock]

Similar? I'm concerned about similar because it is LH side of a/c but is the composition different enough to be deemed not similar? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9900385

[dlowwa]

7 months apart, is that enough time between shots to be not similar, in your opinion. I thought light was irrelevant with regards to "similar"?

Subjective, but would not be similar for me.